ADJ's Response to Radio 4 Programme Broadcast on 3.11.03

The New X-Files - Request for a more balanced coverage of the subject.

It comes as no great surprise that "The New X-Files" failed to present particularly balanced coverage of the important subject matter involved - that of the subject of UFOs and ETI. Though the programme was perhaps "less sceptical" than some others, the closing remarks by Andy Roberts were particularly telling. The insinuation was that we should class people working in this field and those attempting to bring forward the truth are the modern day equivalent of those who believe in fairies and it is "not very logical". If such remarks had been directed at a religious or ethnic group, they would have had to be edited out. But that is only a detail.

Go to www.disclosureproject.org and you will find 400 people from the US and UK military and other government bodies who are logical and do know the truth involved here, and how it has been kept from us in various subtle ways. They have evidence too.

As for the poachers referred to in the programme, did the researchers bother to interview them personally, go and look at their spot lamps to check that their stories checked out? Why would they go poaching at night with such bright lamps? Surely they would be caught? Isn't it a lot of trouble to go to catch a few rabbits or something? This is all part of the misinformation campaign which, people like me (a software developer who also works for the Open University) are working against.

As regards the Rendlesham Incident, you failed to present Lord Norton Hill's testimony to balance what the physicist said (which also tends to suggest Colonel Halt was some kind of fool). I include Lord Hill's testimony for you to include in the next broadcast (in which I am more than willing to take part).

What he (Halt) said is what I have just described. That is one explanation - that it actually happened as Colonel Halt reported.

The other explanation is that it didn't. In that case, one is bound to assume that Colonel Halt and all his men were hallucinating. My position is perfectly clear - either of those explanations is of the utmost defense interest. It has been reported and claimed - and I, myself, have raised it to ministers at the Defense Ministry in this country - that nothing they have been informed about regarding UFOs is of defense interest. Surely, to any sensible person, either of those explanations cannot fail to be of defense interest. That the Colonel of an American Air Force Base in Suffolk and his military men are hallucinating when there are nuclear-armed aircraft on the base - this must be of defense interest.

And, if indeed what he says took place, did take place - and why on Earth should he make it up - then, surely, the entry of a vehicle from outer space (and certainly not manmade) to a defense base in this country also cannot fail to be of defense interest. It simply isn't any good for our ministers - and the Ministry of Defense in particular - to say that nothing took place that December night in Suffolk, or that it is not of defense interest. It simply isn't true.

You can see Lord Hill saying this on video in "Out of the Blue", broadcast in July in the US.

Fortunately, local BBC radio is more open-minded about the subject.

From yet another UFO weirdo who lives in cloud cuckoo land!

Have a look on the Web if you want to find evidence of what has been going on for the last 50 years. You WON'T want to believe in Aliens when you've read it - believe me.