May 3, 2002, 11:11AM
Orion: a spaceship with a heck of a beltBy MARK
CARREAU
PROJECT ORION: The True Story of the Atomic Spaceship.
By George Dyson. Henry Holt, $26.
WITH Project Orion: The True Story of the Atomic
Spaceship, author George Dyson offers a fascinating new
perspective on the earliest days of America's space program.
The prolonged Cold War generated many grandiose scientific and
technical projects, among them the Star Wars missile defense system,
the effort to land a man on the moon, spy satellites, nuclear
submarines. Dyson reveals a lesser-known but all the more amazing
scheme. He describes the largely clandestine attempt by a small team
of World War II bomb designers to convert their weapons of mass
destruction into a new propulsion source for a behemoth
interplanetary spacecraft.
Bankrolled by $10 million in federal funds, this team of about 50
experts plotted to develop a human spacecraft theoretically capable
of establishing Mars settlements and embarking on long missions to
the far reaches of the solar system.
"Saturn by 1970," they proclaimed.
However, the nearly seven-year effort drew to an anticlimactic
end in 1965.
Dyson, the son of the eminent physicist Freeman Dyson and one of
the Orion project's top consultants, unravels the amazing saga in
skillful fashion by weaving the still passionate recollections of
aging participants with historical details gleaned from obscure
government documents.
After World War II, the architects of America's atomic bomb
either regrouped to work on the more powerful hydrogen weapon,
returned to their peacetime pursuits or looked for new endeavors.
The Orion team was assembled in San Diego by former Manhattan
Project physicist Frederic de Hoffman, who was at General Atomics, a
division of defense contractor General Dynamics. Ostensibly formed
to seek commercial markets for atomic power, General Atomics became
a haven for some of the most gifted bomb designers, including
Theodore "Ted" Taylor, who became Project Orion's inspired leader.
With the federal government's Advanced Research Project Agency
and the Air Force serving as overlords, Taylor's team formulated
plans for 4,000- to 10,000-ton spacecraft propelled by the explosive
forces of atomic and hydrogen bombs.
The theorists envisioned their 25-story-tall spacecraft lifting
off from Earth's surface and hurtling toward deep space at an
incredible velocity. The idea was to stockpile thousands of atomic
weapons aboard these spacecraft. As Orion ascended, the bombs would
be jettisoned every quarter to half second, aimed and timed to
explode just dozens of feet away. "It will work, and it will open
the skies to us," Freeman Dyson predicted in 1958. "The problem of
course is to convince oneself one can sit on top of a bomb and not
be fried."
The Orion team was convinced it could tame the explosive forces.
These experts' confidence was based on protective features that
included 100- to 200-foot-wide steel discs called pusher plates. Aft
of the spacecraft, the pusher plates were suspended below large
shock absorbers designed to convert the force of the blasts into a
tremendous momentum for the big ships. The domed crew compartment
was positioned safely above the pusher-plate and shock-absorber
assemblies.
Fleets of well-provisioned Orion spacecraft would be dispatched
to Mars or the moons of Jupiter and Saturn or into Earth orbit. On
board would be dozens of scientists and soldiers. Whole families
might be dispatched on multigenerational voyages to the closest
stars.
Ultimately, Orion was orphaned by the Pentagon and died largely a
theoretical exercise. Struggling to reach the moon with conventional
rockets, NASA was not interested in a concept so radical. Fear of
the radiation that would be unleashed during test flights was too
much for even Orion's staunchest supporters.
During most of Orion's brief life, the United States and the
Soviet Union were engaged in almost unrestrained atomic
experimentation, including frequent atmospheric tests of larger and
larger weapons. But under growing global pressure, the two nuclear
superpowers agreed to stop atmospheric testing under the terms of a
1963 test-ban treaty.
The treaty dashed hopes for Orion. Even an 11th-hour bid to loft
the planetary cruisers out of the atmosphere with conventional
rockets before setting off the nuclear fireworks failed.
Orion seems like an incredible pipe dream. But superpower fears
and suspicions drove Cold War thinking. "It was a crazy era," Brian
Dunne, Orion's chief scientist, informed the author. "All of our
values were tweaked by the Cold War. It was a closed society, and
all kinds of crazy ideas were able to grow."
Earlier this year, the Bush administration directed NASA to
re-examine the nation's space nuclear options.
Initially, the agency hopes to restart production of the small
plutonium generators that furnished the electrical power for the
Pioneer, Voyager and Galileo spacecraft that gave us the first
close-up images of Jupiter, Saturn and other bodies deep in the
solar system.
But new NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe is also pressing the case
for using the same fission reactors that have successfully powered
the Navy's submarines and aircraft carriers for a half-century.
Without the reactors, the United States cannot sustain its reach
into deep space, he asserts.
One can only speculate what it would take to rekindle interest in
an Orion-style spacecraft. But if astronomers were to spot a huge
asteroid barreling toward Earth, the once fanciful Orion, possibly
fueled with bombs contributed by all the world's nuclear powers,
might offer one of the few viable strategies for intercepting and
destroying it.
The fears that long ago grounded plans for the swift spacecraft
would then pale in the face of a new global threat.
Mark Carreau covers NASA for the Chronicle.
|