Has the Weapon Which Destroyed the WTC Been Used Before or Since 9/11?

Andrew Johnson - ad.johnson@ntlworld.com

18 Feb 2018

This question comes up fairly regularly, and the answer is “we don’t know for sure.” However, I thought I would post a few images here to summarise what Dr Wood (and to a lesser extent, myself) has/have come across in the last few years.

One observation that Dr Wood made quite a few years ago is regarding the destruction of the Alfred P Murrah building in 1995. It also may have involved some type of energy weapon. The damage it experienced was quite similar to that experienced by WTC 6.

One picture of the inside of WTC6 and the other is the Murrah Building in OKC. Can you tell which is which? (Hint: one of them has a wheatchex at the bottom.) from: http://www.drjudywood.com/#history

Also of note were cars near the OKC building [i]:

Image result for okc bombing

Also of note is the state of the OKC site in 2017:

Image result for alfred p murrah federal building memorial

Alfred P Murrah Building – Memorial – A Water Feature. There is a water feature now on the site of the WTC towers.

A while back, we discussed if the weapon system was used again in Syria, at a site alleged to be one being used for some type of nuclear testing or development:

Satellite images from Aug. 10 and Oct. 24 by DigitalGlobe

Satellite imagery of a facility in Syria collected on August 10, 2007, left, and October 24, right.

(Photos from New York Times)

Also, there was the attack on the Khobar towers in Saudi Dhahran Arabia in 1996:

Nineteen Airmen died and hundreds were injured in the terrorist attack at Khobar Towers in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, on June 25, 1996. The front of Bldg. 131 was blown off when a fuel truck parked nearby was detonated by terrorists. (Courtesy photo)

Image from af.mil.

The damage to the building has some similarities to that in WTC 6 and the APM building.

Another interesting reference, which might be relevant, is in a series called Bright Skies by Harry Mason (a geologist). There is a YouTube video of a lecture he gave in 2010, but it has poor sound and picture quality, unfortunately. Somewhat better is a 10-minute segment from an ITV documentary, made in 1997. These are included below.