BYU Professor Steven Jones Exposes Controlled Demolition of WTC on

From: Andrew Johnson

Date: 2005-11-16 20:50:34

BYU Professor Steven Jones Exposes Controlled Demolition of WTCon MSNBCYou can see the MSNBC video clip… also have the audio interview with Professor Jones if anybody wants to hear it…His paper can bee seen… to this interview, this is what an observer had to say:Tonight on Tucker Carlson’s ‘The Situation’, Tucker responded to calls he received stating that Steven Jones was not given enough time on last night’s show by stating:[referring to the caller]your one of dozens, scores, maybe hundreds of people who called and wrote after our segment last night…[referring to Steven Jones]he claims in his writings.. he believes the U.S. government had a role in blowing up the world trade center, that it was not done by terrorists…if you really believe the U.S. government killed 3000 of its own citizens for no reason and lied about it and invaded Afghanistan as a result of something it did, you ought to leave the country.. because that’s so terrible.. so evil, that your tax dollars go in to support it make you complicit in it. if you really believe that, you ought to leave..but we’re gunna keep an open mind..Here are some comments about this situation below… Tucker exemplifies the reasons why it is necessary to leave it up to scientists and researchers, and not government cronies and talking heads, to investigate the truth behind 9/11, because otherwise one might be blinded by their own assumptions and emotions. Tucker not only acted as though his moral compass is above those that question 9/11 (specifically a 20+ year Professor at BYU), but he also committed slander in his comments about Steven Jones’ research.While the report written by Steven Jones mentions the U.S. government several times in reference to their failures of investigation, at no point in his paper does he suggest the government was involved in carrying out the attacks, although I’m sure many others would, and have.In response to Carlson’s statements I have a few questions:Should American’s who believe the war in Iraq was based on intentional lies also leave the country?Does an administration that has killed thousands, and maimed tens of thousands all based on fraud, corruption, and lies still deserve ignorant blind faith regarding 9/11?Do the Jersey Girls (who said the 9/11 Commission Report was a ‘hollow failure’) need to leave the country?What about the 50% of New Yorkers who believe the government had prior knowledge and ‘consciously failed to act?’Should the German’s who questioned the Reichstag Fire have left their country?Should these ~9,000 people asking for a criminal investigation pack their bags as well?While Tucker’s comments are reminiscent of similar statements made about those that questioned the Iraq war (those that question the war should either keep quiet or leave the country!), I am hopeful that most American’s have come to terms with their lame duck media, and know that if they want the truth they have to find it themselves.————————————-The comments by Alex Jones are below…Today I had a chance to see Tucker Carlson attempt to grill BYU Physics Professor Dr. Steven Jones. Carlson implied that the Professor was aiding evil terrorists in the Middle East. He never gave the professor more than 10 seconds without interrupting him.Professor Jones is to be commended, though, because he made the key point that buildling 7 wasn’t hit by an airplane and that molten steel was found in the basements of all three buildings weeks later, when only massive amounts of thermite explosives can cause this effect.The good news is that the controlled press is on the defensive more and more and is being forced to respond to the alternative media that, in many cases, rivals government-controlled organs or propaganda, and in some cases is now eclipsing them.I have never seen Tucker Carson so upset. He looked like a scared little boy. His body language screamed inner conflict. You can tell that he knows that it’s true and that he fought with his producers to even be able to get Jones on, and that he was supposed to attack Jones. But, whereas in the past, many of the people he attacked he disagreed with, with Jones he feels like Judas.The only thing that even neared an effective attack on Carlson’s part was his line about how a fuel oil tank under Building 7 made it collapse. The problem with this 4-year-old conspiracy theory is that FEMA has long since retracted it and now says they don’t know why Buildling 7 fell.Don’t forget the Madrid building. It burned for over 36 hours, over 70 percent of its floors had 100-ft white-hot flames shooting towards the sky, yet none of its major supports even bent. Metal desks in the center of the Madrid inferno, while blackened, were still useable.

Related articles...

Comments are closed.