From: Andrew Johnson
Date: 2006-01-12 21:21:17
wtc.nist.gov/media/W… This is about as obvious as cover-ups get (the Demolition of WTC 7 being the main key to 9-11 Truth, as it was not hit by a plane). Someone on our forum posted this: www.nist.gov/public_… Which is a PDF document of the September 2005 slideshow at the NIST WTC Conference (September 12, 2005) by Dr. S. ShyamSunder, NIST Lead Investigator. The final slide has the following details: Quote: Planned Schedule for WTC 7 Reports January 2006 Completion of technical work March 2006 Draft reports for review April 2006 Draft reports to NCST AC May 2006 Reports for public comment June 2006 Publication From the recent pronouncement on January 2006 (see post above) that the time schedule for the publication of any WTC7 report will now be 10 months from the appointment of a contractor to assist the NIST with the WTC7 explanations (or making the analysis & the available videos fit), i.e. around November 2006, it appears that the NIST does not seem to be able to keep its story straight. This is, needless to say, over 4 years since the WTC7 event happened. Of course, this is the same Dr. Shyam Sunder of the NIST, who made the following comment during the NIST Public Meeting in New York on February 12, 2004, when asked by Investigative Reporter Nico Haupt about many of the glaring inconsistencies surrounding the unprecedented implosion of WTC 7; among other issues; Haupt asked for a simple explanation as to how WTC 7 imploded into its footprint in less than 8 seconds. The following is Dr. Sunders reply to Nico Haupts concerns: Quote: Thank you very much. We will fully report. We have begun reporting, and we will fully report on the fires in WTC 7, the causes of the collapse in WTC 7, as well as any other evidence from first-person accounts about 7 So stay tuned, we will get more information as time goes
