Re: Hopsicker and Citizen Spook

From: Andrew

Date: 2006-06-03 23:38:05

— In Cognoscence@yahoogro…, “Briseis Gatto” wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > Interesting post on Citizen Spook about Hopsicker, > > sounds very plausible. Can you share any other > > reason you have to trust CS, and distrust Hopsicker? > > Many good wishes, > > Briseis > Briseis, It’s not so much that I “trust” Citizen Spook, but it seems that anyone who is a *serious* researcher can easily find out that what happened to the WTC 1, 2 & 7 can only be explained by the use of massive explosives – i.e. you just study the laws of Physics. The statements Hopsicker makes in his own article either show he is a disinfo artist, or he hasn’t done the research – both of which are suspect for a “9/11 Truther”. The CIA background of Hopsicker I haven’t checked, but if true it does strongly suggest he’s a plant. Even without that evidence, however, the Science issue is the key one. Take care Andrew

Related articles...

Comments are closed.