The Latest UFO Press Conference

Following the Press tieing in the UFO issue to the 9/11 Security angle in a number of the press reports (Reuters, BBC, AOL News and probably others), I was given to e-mail this letter to James Fox and Leslie Kean – two of the "movers and shakers" of this event.

I feel it is very important to consider these "goings on" and the subtleties in reporting (which hasn’t been very good, but it has been widely covered).

Dear James and Lesley,
I have been appreciative and admiring of your respective efforts to get information and answers in relation to the UFO/ET Cover up since I first became aware of your work in mid-2003. I would therefore like to express my thanks for this.
I notice that Reuters included reference to "security" and 9/11 in their story coverage:


An international panel of two dozen former pilots and government officials called on the U.S. government on Monday to reopen its generation-old UFO investigation as a matter of safety and security given continuing reports about flying discs, glowing spheres and other strange sightings.
"Especially after the attacks of 9/11, it is no longer satisfactory to ignore radar returns … which cannot be associated with performances of existing aircraft and helicopters," they said in a statement released at a news conference.

In recent months and years, I have now become aware of the links between 9/11 and the UFO cover up and how likely it seems that the perpertrators of 9/11 are probably the same group of people responsible for controlling information on most aspects of the UFO phenomenon. Most people are extremely reluctant to study and talk about both these issues, preferring to focus and discuss one and not be drawn into the other (Steven Greer might be a good example of this).
One of the key "segments" of the UFO cover up is the black budget and black technology – and I think it is this area that now most obviously ties in to 9/11, along with the energy issue (in UFO terms "what advanced energy systems are used to power the craft")?
Following the publication of the research of Dr Judy Wood in Oct 2006, I came to the conclusion that black technology was used to destroy WTC Towers 1 & 2 (in 20 seconds) – and it amounts to a disclosure that someone has technology which can access almost infinite almost free energy.
These sound, perhaps, like wild connections to make, but the same rules apply as those used to understand the UFO phenomenon – and everything else – you have to look at the evidence. Ask yourself this, when pictures show that the debris pile from towers 1 and 2 was less than 3 stories high, then where did the buildings go?
What force turned them to dust, without a mushroom cloud of some kind.
My guess is that the people running everything (PTB – or whatever you call them) want to build up the fear of aliens or an alien invasion or both, and maintain their control of planet earth. The evidence shows the ET issue is much more complicated and we seem to be interacting with a range of different entities (some less physical than others). As an example of what I think PTB are up to, have a look at how closely Hollywood and "real life" correspond:
I hope that we can short-circuit the PTB’s plan to subvert attempts to get answers – and make a better world for us all – into another fear card, to be stacked in the deck with all the others. And why does Nick Pope think 19 hijackers did 911 when he’s smart and there is no evidence to support the Official Story of 9/11?
I trust you will be wary of your efforts being co-opted and being converted into another fear issue, which will likely be as fake as the fake war on terror which has dominated global issues since 9/11/01. This will then line up with the fake CO2 problem and the fake health threat issues. I contend that the full deck is being and will be used to control people’s thinking and behaviour. Politicians no longer offer dreams, only protection from nightmares. Can we change this? I would like to think we can.
Thanks for reading.

Andrew Johnson


Related articles...

Comments are closed.