From: Andrew Johnson
Date: 2008-02-22 15:37:24
Some well observed points from someone on my e-mail list (are we being ramped up for the faked alien invasion scenario still?) Andrew, some comments on the dark side of “Controller” intervention. 1. “source … frustrated…” (Over potential intervention by “hostile” ET types?) 2. “…issue of recent sighting…” (Well, who were they? Friend of foe?) 3, 4. “Security…intense.” (Meant to give the impression that the meeting actually happened, which it may well have.) 5,6,7. “Russians…military there…Russians are paranoid…” (Implies human military is in charge? A sign of fear that the “controllers” – “hostile” ETs will force human depopulation?) 8. “…must get population … under control… ET will help…” (This could also be interpreted as “hostile” ETs who favor extermination?) 9. “The real date of contact is 2017.” (Huge ET craft sitting over cities doesn’t sound like “friendly” non-intervention types. More a “controller” thing?) 10. “…our choice how we embrace this contact.” Might be doubtful. Since when to the PTB want us to know anything about real choice?) 11. “The Controllers” (Sounds more like “hostile” intervention types? A fear technique here?) 12. “… a keen sense if freedom and free will…” (Perhaps were talking about real “friendly” ETs – not “controller, hostile” ETs.) 13. “… will not … feed ourselves…” (Do the “controllers or hostile” ETs really want our extermination? If so, is Papa Bush taking his orders from them? See: www.brasschecktv.com… 14. “… religious implications of contact.” (Do “friendly” ETs actually hate religion, whereas “hostile” ETs like to use it as a manipulation tool?) Is this a setup for playing the ET invasion card? (This is not to imply that Michael is naive. My sense is that he always plays it to extract to most information. Will the alleged document that he hopes to see ever surface?) Dan. Dear Michael,This email is a follow up of the UN meeting which took place Tuesday 12, 2008 at 8;00AM.We met our source 7:00PM, Monday, February 18, 2008. Our source stated the following:1) The meeting went well; however, our source left with a degree of frustration.2) The meeting covered various topics. The issue of recent UFO sightings was one of manytopics discussed.3) Security around the meeting was intense.4) Everyone was searched. Pens, pins, key chain items were collected and not allowed in the meeting room. There were multiple security checkpoints. UN security cardswere confiscated upon entering the room.5) 50 to 60 people attended. Everyone was in civilian dress, except one Russian. 6) Other countries may have had military there, but they came under their respective civilian titles.7) UFO topic was addressed. The Russians are very paranoid about the west. Putinis not very trusting. This frustrated our source greatly. Our source believes theRussians will eventually come around; “They always come back to the table.”This mistrust appears to be an ongoing issue between East & West.8) The religious implications of contact came up during the meeting. It turned into a20 minute debate. Our source had to reel it in and refocus the meeting. It seems thatthe Indians are very difficult to deal with on this issue of the religious implicationsregarding contact. Population is a major factor in how nation-states deal with a new paradigm. The Indian’s world view has led to an unsustainable food, energy and waterdemand. Source stated that the world must gets its population and resource useunder control. ET will help, but we must show them that we intend to live within ourconstraints. If we don’t show some semblance of intent, they simply will not help.9) Source said the 2013 date of official contact is wrong. That is the date when things heat up. The real date of contact is 2017. It is on this date when very large craft will appearabove cities and sit. There will be NO use of force; they will just sit there. Source stated the “Independence Day” film was close, but their ships are not that big and, again, no use of force will occur. Our source cannot reveal his source for the 2017date. His source is very high up in the government/military/intelligence structure.10) Source stated that it is our choice how we embrace this contact.11) The ET’s who will arrive on 2017 are referred to as “The Controllers.” They are a “galactic federation” type group; however, “galactic federation” is not the realname for their group–it is hypothetical name used as a reference.12) The controllers have a keen sense of freedom and free will. They will not intervene and help humanity if humanity does not show them we want their help. If some entropic event happens (nuclear war), the controllers will not make contact. “This is something they will not tolerate,” our source stated.13) The controllers will not give us technology to expand our ability to feed ourselvesif we do not recognize the necessity to stabilize our population growth. They don’twant our planet’s population to double because of a technological innovation seededby them. Our source used India as an example, ” India has over 1 billion people. It is clearly a country out of balance in terms of its population size.”14) A contentious moment in the meeting had to do with the religious implications of contact. It is this issue which is of most concern. Our source stated that the moresecular societies will adjust more easily to contact than the fundamentalist. He stated,” The Roman Catholic countries will not have a rough time, except for the population problem; the Roman Catholics already have three Gods in one, so accepting others is not that much of a stretch. The dividing point is going to be the containment ofpopulation. The Protestant countries will deal fairly easily with contact. So will countries with indigenous religions connected to nature. The Muslim, Hindu, and fundamentalist Christian religions will have the most difficult time, possibly even theelimination of said religions; we can expect mass suicides, social unrest and upheaval. The ETs will help with re-programming and the concept of an inclusivegalactic order. However, society will have to step up to the plate to assist – one onone – those people who have shattered belief systems The Chinese will have no problem because of the Buddhist and Taoist influences.”Clay and Shawn Pickering
