From: Andrew Johnson
Date: 2008-05-20 15:40:58
Censored by none other than John Moffat My reply below. Use the link to mail him if you wish. —–Original Message—– From: Administrator [mailto:nobody@www.opednews….] Sent: 20 May 2008 15:19 To: ad.johnson@ntlworld…. Subject: OpEdNews Status of article by Andrew Johnson: New Study by former Professor Examines Hurricane Erin on 9/11/01 Sorry, but we’re going to pass on this article. You submitted an article titled: New Study by former Professor Examines Hurricane Erin on 9/11/01 This article was submitted with category Life_Arts_Science and tags Energy, Energy, Engineering, Fraud, Hurricane-Toronado, Trade Op Ed News Administrator P.S. Dear Andrew, Thank you for submitting your article “New Study by former Professor Examines Hurricane Erin on 9/11/01” to OEN. Dr. Judy Wood provides no edidence for her theories, and as such, they can’t be taken seriously by scientist, like myself. Spreading her nonsense does not help the 9/11 truth movement, it hurts it, as I have written before. Her poorly reasoned articles are found on her own website, and do not need to be re-posted elsewhere. Best regards, John Moffett, Ph.D. OEN managing editor Your Original Submission is attached to this email Please do NOT reply to this email; no one will see it. If you’d like to reply to the editor, you may click the following link to enter a message for the editor: www.opednews.com/Mes… =================================== Dear Mr Moffat, I don’t think you have examined the evidence posted. I’m sorry, I can’t take you seriously as a scientist if you refuse to examine evidence. As you should be aware some of this evidence has been taken to court. I suggest you read my OpEdNews diary entry about ignoring evidence. I think it is very widely applicable. www.opednews.com/max… Your statement that “Dr. Judy Wood provides no edidence for her theories” is false backs up the conclusions of my article (now posted far and wide). Firstly, she has provided more evidence than most if not all other researchers in her STUDIES. She has not quoted a particular “theory” – she discusses evidence. The press release also discusses evidence, and a clear distinction is made within it. You do truth no favours in ignoring evidence. Good luck in your continued ignoring of evidence. As you are probably aware, NIST’s contractors are now being sued for ignoring evidence – and lots of it. Finally, our press release has also gone far and wide – no thanks to you. Yours Sincerely Andrew Johnson BSc in Computer Science and Physics www.checktheevidence… No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 269.23.21/1455 – Release Date: 5/19/2008 5:04 PM
