Re: UK Independent: Magnetic forces to blame for 9/11 tower collapse

From: David Griffin

Date: 2008-09-17 13:04:17

Hmmm… methinks they have half the story as usual… Love this oft-touted line: “high enough to cause it because the thermal insulation was knocked off the girders through the impact with the aircraft,” he said.” If you want some dark humour – watch this: www.youtube.com/watc… 911 THE EMPERORS CLOTHES From: fknnewz Views: 5,934 Comments: 192 Comments [check the cold fusion debate just started] www.youtube.com/comm… davID == On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Andrew Johnson wrote: >http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/magnetic-forces-to-blame-for-911-tower-collapse-924509.html > > Magnetic forces to blame for 9/11 tower collapse > > By Steve Connor > Wednesday, 10 September 2008 > > Scientists can finally explain why the Twin Towers collapsed on September > 11, despite the temperature of the fires being well below the 1,500C melting > point of the steel girders holding up the buildings. > > The discovery that unusual magnetic forces within the girders made them weak > at temperatures of about 500C explains away the conspiracy theories that > have spread like wildfire since the disaster. > > Sergei Dudarev, of the UK Atomic Energy Agency, found that steel loses its > strength above 500C because its molecules undergo a physical transition from > one state to another due to magnetic fluctuations. “The steel didn’t melt, > it just became soft. It is an unusual state and the temperatures in the Twin > Towers were high enough to cause it because the thermal insulation was > knocked off the girders through the impact with the aircraft,” he said. > > “Understanding how materials behave means we can find the right ‘medicine’ > to make steel stronger at high temperatures… and if our work can be used > for other applications, such as safeguarding tall buildings against > disasters, so much the better,” he said. > > ________________________________ > > Are you interested in what’s really going on in the world, behind the > facade? Then… >http://www.checktheevidence.com/ > > What happened on 9/11? >http://www.drjudywood.com/ > > > >