From: Andrew Johnson
Date: 2009-03-22 19:46:24
Webster G Tarpley on the research involving DEW being used to destroy the WTC on 9/11: In 2007, Webster Tarpley appeared in Bradford UK, asked a question about Dr Woods Qui Tam case against NIST, he responded and said: www.youtube.com/watc… I believe that research should be carried out you cannot ban any research a priori. Ive always argued for a research sphere separated from a political sphere and what I think of as the political sphere is what weve seen [in his presentation] it has to with for example using 9/11 and the Rogue B52 to get impeachment going because without 9/11 truth, you cannot defeat Bush politically. So I am always in favour of a political sphere which is separate from a research sphere. For a lot of people in the United States, the research sphere is all there is What do you think of the Directed Energy Weapons scenario? Hang on I am getting to it, but the political sphere for me is indispensable. Now, I would never say I wont co-operate with someone because they have a theoretical difference from me. I dont think its possible to talk about men from mars. I dont recommend blaming it on the action of the holy spirit much as I like the Holy Spirit -but short of this, I would not have any preclusion. Concerning her theory, I think her theory is something she has failed to prove. I dont see her successfully proving the beam theory and I like Fetzer very much and I try to co-operate with Fetzer on political matters, but I have not been convinced by the Space Laser or Beam Weapons or new Physical Principles argument. So, I think its fine for them to continue with this but you have to realise that this is an unproven hypothesis. I think it is not wise if they get a chance to be on television to make that the leading edge. I would not do that . Are you interested in what’s really going on in the world, behind the facade? Then…www.checktheevidence… happened on 9/11?www.drjudywood.com/
