New brief Article – 9/11 Mind Squash – SOMEONE ELSE DO SOMETHING!

From: Andrew Johnson

Date: 2009-08-17 20:40:44

www.checktheevidence…   9/11 Mind Squash – “SOMEONE ELSE DO SOMETHING”!       This is a hastily composed response to another new article “9/11 Mind Swell” has recently garnered considerable attention round the internet in “calling for a new 9/11 inquiry”. The author of this article is Joel S. Hirchshorn – listed as a specialist in Metallurgical Engineering, Materials Engineering, Environmental Education, Political Analysis, and Public Policy. Some time ago, Hirschorn and Barbara G Ellis wanted to present a Bill to Congress about “problems” with the official 9/11 story.    However, this Bill did not mention Hurricane Erin being closest to NYC at 8am on 9/11 and it only mentioned Dr Wood’s research in passing (and it did not mention her federal law suit and challenges to NIST). People attacked the Bill for even mentioning a small amount of the evidence presented by Dr Wood! (See above link)   So, there is a history behind this new article, which involves Prof Jim Fetzer (documented in detail elsewhere on this site). Here is a brief summary:   1) Steve Jones (cold fusion cover-up-erer) and Jim Fetzer start Scholars for 911 truth in 20052) Jones leaves “Scholars” in 2007 in an engineered split and starts “911 Truth and Justice”3) Fetzer continues with Kevin Barrett – sort of – but Barrett doesn’t agree that the WTC steel turned to dust (as Jones didn’t)4) Fetzer gradually moves back to supporting Jones and marginalising Dr Judy Wood – once the Hutchison Effect and Erin studies are revealed.5) Fetzer threatens Wood’s reputation over Hutchison Effect research.6) 2009 – Hirschorn (author of the article) joins Fetzer as new “co-chair” of Scholars for 9/11 Truth.7) “Mind Swell” – article calls for a “new investigation into 9/11” whilst completely ignoring the one completed by Dr Judy Wood – a specialist in Mechanics and Materials Science – who has put her evidence in a legal case.8) Everyone again trashes the most important, comprehensive and explanatory research contained in the only independent 9/11 enquiry so far completed. Hirchshorn and his “followers” cannot address or explain the evidence this enquiry describes. (Which I saw on a site where the article was reposted).    Scholars for 9/11 Truth supports the efforts of Barbara Ellis, Joel Hirschorn, Warren Pease, and Bill Ball in submitting a draft bill  to Congress concerning the necessity for a reinvestigation of 9/11 in order to reform any building codes that could have been undermined.  An article about this may be found here .   This “mind swell” article has again attracted a great deal of attention – but it discusses nothing of real importance – and doesn’t even acknowledge legal action already taken! It just suggests SOMEONE ELSE should do something! It seems to be that, as a rule of thumb, if a 9/11 article doesn’t mention Hurricane Erin and it doesn’t mention John Hutchison (without ridicule and accusations of fraud), it’s a fairly safe bet it’s part of the cover up. (Why does Hirchshorn not mention the most important aspects of 9/11 research and action in his article?)   Are you interested in what’s really going on in the world, behind the facade? Then…www.checktheevidence… happened on 9/11?    

Related articles...

Comments are closed.