Could There Be A Directed Energy Weapons Connection?
January 4, 2010
I had, for a long time (since the 1980’s), thought that vacuum energy was only a domain of virtual electron/positron pairs, endlessly trying to make it into physical existence, but almost always failing to do so due to a lack of energy. And, if a real electron happened to "fall" into a Dirac positive "hole" another electron would be "created", "balancing the books" of electric charge. Life was still good. (Actually, on the physical side of nature, one needed to "observe" a very high energy photon passing near enough into the electric field gradient of an atomic nucleus for the "creation" of a detectable electron/positron pair. I could only but wonder what, if any, role the vacuum structure played in the event. But one was always left with the following uneasy question: Could a super heavy (charged) atom with a very strong electric field gradient pull a virtual electron/positron pair out of the vacuum?)
Lately, I have come to be in favor of the Subquantum Kinetics model of vacuum energy, where various types of etheric particles are proposed to exist. In this theory, an electric potential is created by a concentration of these etheric particles (etherons) through a reaction/diffusion process that creates the wave nature of real particles. (Assuming the critical mass/energy is reached.) The wave that is thought to be "created" is known – in the Subquantum Kinetics model – as a Turing wave (2). The fundamental frequency (thus energy) of an electron (the Compton wavelength) would need to have its source from within the "vacuum".
I have just recently become aware of Dr. Harold Aspden’s theories concerning vacuum energy. He refers to it using the word Aether, which of course, has a long history of thought as to what an etheric domain might be (1). After reading some of Aspden’s vacuum theory work – which proposes that the vacuum of outer space has a "kind of liquid-crystal structure" and can form rotating etheric "space domains" – I was left with an uneasy feeling like: Why haven’t I heard about this man thirty, forty, fifty years ago! (Actually there are, no doubt, disturbing reasons why mainstream science kept that from generally happening. But one would think that a man with this kind of depth of thinking would be more widely known.)
What I find very interesting about Dr. Aspden’s model of vacuum energy is that it also proposes an ever-existing field of virtual muon/anti-muon pairs. And, the theory proposed that these virtual muons are endlessly trying to bring protons into existence! Aspden refers to the virtual and real muons as ‘ubiquitous muons’ (3). (I sometimes think of a real muon as a sort of embarrassment for the modern day physicist as it’s measured anomalous magnetic moment value has been reported to be at odds with theory (4). Could this be trying to tell us something is seriously wrong with the so-called Standard Model of physics?)
(Note: The muon is an elementary particle first noticed in the decay debris of cosmic radiation in 1936 by Carl D. Anderson (5). The discovery was apparently quite a surprise for most physicists at the time and was greeted by Nobel Laureate I.I. Rabi with the now famous and well known quip – "Who ordered that?". The particle was originally thought to be a meson (particles later defined as having internal "quark" constituents) but is now considered – per the so-called Standard Model – a member of the Lepton particle family. There are three known leptons that have mass – the well known electron, .511 MeV in energy/mass, the muon, 105 MeV and the tau (tauon), about 1782 MeV. Aspden identifies the tau particle with the graviton, thus it is the source of gravity.)
Getting back to the aether theory, Aspden believes that his theory predicts outer space regions called ‘space domains’ and ‘anti-space domains’ (SASD) of etheric energy and that every great once and awhile the Earth could pass through them with perhaps devastating geomagnetic reversal effects. (Geomagnetic reversals, I believe, have been recorded throughout the ages of time in earth rocks.) Worse than that though, since the aether structure has the graviton aspect (the source of gravity), apparently passing through one of these "space domains" could force a (hopefully) short "earthly matter gravity switching-off period" (6). (A very interesting concept indeed, if it were true!)
Assuming that aether structures of SASD’s are real, might we dare ask if these aether space domains can be artificially created on a smaller scale? Of course some might suggest at this point here that a gravity switching-off effect might be what is being observed during Hutchison Effect experiments, as performed by John Hutchison (7). (As is well known, destructive effects on the materials being tested are also accompanied with some of these experiments.)
Let us consider the possibility that there are people who actually know that SASD’s (as Aspden defines them) are real, i.e. they (NASA?) might have some proof. Might they try to create anti-gravity or directed energy weapons (DEW) based on using such SASD vacuum principles/laws? For example, such a weapon might have been the one which turned the WTC into dust, as actually happened on 9/11/2001. Let’s look at Aspden’s theory a little closer.
Aspden’s theory claims (as I understand it) that ‘space domains’ form boundaries of space and anti-space regions of etheric charges, and that ‘vacuum spin’ – aether rotation – will take place. This will set up a situation where the aether will shed energy to maintain the existence of the SASD’s (6). (My guess is that this would be proportional to the amount of aether charge and gravity contraction within the SASD.) What would be the meaning of an increased density of virtual muon pairs within the domain? Possibly creating more nuclear charges, increasing its potential destructive capacity as it passes through a planet?
Some questions. Could an SASD DEW beam (assuming it were possible to build one) contaminate real matter when exposed to such a beam? Could the beam cancel out molecular binding forces? Could virtual muons be forced to condense into matter, cancelling nuclear binding forces? Could other unknown exotic particles be created (8)? Would some form of Alfven Waves be created in the operation of an SASD beam weapon (9)? Could an SASD be an efficient source of negative muons for a muon-catalyzed fusion power source (10)? (Maybe someone with some advanced physics training could look into some of these questions/concepts?)
Since most everything in the Universe is spinning – from galaxies right down to the so-called intrinsic quantized spin of elementary particles – perhaps it is not unreasonable to believe in spinning etheric SASD’s. The "humble" beginnings of all stars? Do SASD’s, once formed in a big enough state, start to endlessly pull protons out of the vacuum which later start to fuse into the well known atomic particles of the physical Universe? Perhaps so, if energetic vacuum/etheric theories are correct.
What determines the size of SASD’s is perhaps unknown. Obviously etheric energy density and being able to calculate how the domain acquires angular momentum are factors, but Aspden has yet to figure that out. Nevertheless, his estimate of what could create our Sun/Solar System might be in the hundreds of light years in diameter. On micro scales we have magnetic domain walls within the crystals of ferromagnetic materials. Could ‘SASD energy creators’ be made with a diameter of say, 20 meters? Hard to say, but might that be a useful size for deep space vehicles!
I am not suggesting in this essay that Aspden’s theories are totally correct or that I even understand them anywhere as deep as he does. But am I suggesting that an exotic machine could generate very small SASD’s with very destructive capabilities? Perhaps. Perhaps the Hutchison effect is doing this on a very small scale. But I’ll leave it up to you, the readers, to research this further and make up your own mind by following the references below – if interested.
References
1. For a quick review of who Dr. Aspden is, his theories and accomplishments, what his critics think of some of it, I recommend reading this: peswiki.com/index.ph…
2. The Electric Charge and Magnetization Distribution of The Nucleon – Evidence of a Subatomic Turing Wave Pattern: www.bibliotecapleyad…
3. The Physics of Creation: Contents: www.aspden.org/books…
4. Muon Orbit May defy Main Physics Theory: www.thefreelibrary.c…
5. The Muon: en.wikipedia.org/wik…
6. World In Peril: Impending Doom: www.aetherscience.or…
7. The reader can review many Hutchison Effect YouTube videos by searching on John Hutchison.
8. Exotic particles: en.wikipedia.org/wik…
9. Alfven waves: en.wikipedia.org/wik…
10. Muon-catalyzed fusion: en.wikipedia.org/wik…
11. A message of vital importance from Dr. Aspden: Our Energy Future: www.aetherscience.or…
