From: Andrew Johnson
Date: 2010-11-04 12:55:11
For those of you now familiar with this character and why this is somewhat significant, I have written expensively of my experience and correspondence with him in my free e-book here: tinyurl.com/911ftb To try and be accurate, Fetzer is repeating what Phil Jayhan (another 9/11 commentator0 apparently suggested in an earlier radio interview. This recording is from Aug 2010: www.checktheevidence… (from www.checktheevidence…) Here, Fetzer is offering this bizarre story (backed up by no properly referenced evidence). The significance of this seems to be that it is yet another muddle-up of the observation originally made by Dr Judy Wood – some time ago – that no porcelain was seen in the rubble of the WTC – it would be highly visible. It’s a clear indication of how utterly the building was “dustified” – see this page www.drjudywood.com/w… a while to load) This is what Fetzer actually said (watch out for the reference to nudity) “There were a rather substantial number of Israeli art students who were in the towers high…. I guess they must’ve been in both towers… who… this is very very interesting that you asked this because I recently had 2 guests on my radio show – Phil and Larry – who had photographs showing – it looked to them as though the building was being dismantled. They gave a list of the staggering contents that should’ve been there there – like 347,000 toilets or urinals – that kind of thing – and err none of which was found at ground zero. And their suggestion is that actually the building was being “prepped” well in advance and had largely been evacuated of the kinds of content that could be stripped out of the building. What’s most interesting about their photographs – is you see some photographs of some of these so-called art students who are engaged in performance art – they establish a balcony on the outside perimeter of the building for example and went out to… to.. I don’t know… they were nude as a part of their performance or… and they’re suggesting that it might have had something to do with the planning for the demolition of the building. It’s very peculiar – very, very peculiar.” This seems to be yet another indication of the extreme length to which the cover up crew are going to distract people away from a simple observation of the evidence…. Are you interested in what’s really going on in the world, behind the facade? Then…www.checktheevidence… happened on 9/11?www.drjudywood.com/
