Re: FW: Theories For Dead Birds And Fish

From: post2wm@gmx.de

Date: 2011-01-08 02:04:44

add to this “Sorcha Faal”s analysis / thesis of phosgene: http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1435.htm At 21:53 07.01.2011, you wrote: >This covers most bases – and does not draw any conclusions. Being >pedantic, I don’t really think we can “rank” these theories, hence >my slight change of subject. Also, it says near the end “we are >facing an array of human tampering” – I don’t necessarily agree its >”human” – not by my definition of that word… > > >———- >From: Kathy Roberts [mailto:weerkhr@pacbell.net] >Sent: 07 January 2011 16:52 >To: Undisclosed-Recipient: ;@smtp105.sbc.mail.ac4.yahoo.com >Subject: The 10 Leading Theories For Dead Birds And Fish > >http://www.activistpost.com/2011/01/10-leading-theories-for-dead-birds-and.html >