From: Andrew Johnson
Date: 2012-03-17 10:05:47
Another interesting update from Lloyd Pye . More problems for anthropologists that won’t acknowledge that we have separate lines of hominoids existing up to fairly modern times – they are not related to us directly). From: Starchild Project [mailto:contact@starchildpro…] Sent: 16 March 2012 16:46 To: ad.johnson@ntlworld…. Subject: Anthropology breakthrough creates many questions. I have never received more comments about a news story…. ….than the one about the ” Red Deer Cave ” skulls and other bones that were recently announced in China . www.bbc.co.uk/news/s… As the article makes clear, these are not human bones. In every way they are the skulls of primates, with heavy brow ridges, wide cheekbones, flat faces, wide noses, prognathous jaws, and no chin. Perfect hominoid faces (like we would expect to find with Bigfoot, Almas , Yeti, or Agogwes) on bipedal bodies, but living in the range of only 12,000 to 13,000 years ago. This date creates an enormous problem for mainstream scientists. They MUST find a way to classify these beings as some kind of aberrant humans, or they would have to face the obvious fact that these are the bones of hominoids (bipedal, hair-covered primates), which would immediately shove humans off the flow-chart of life on Earth. That would drive a spear through the heart of human evolution, and cause a nuclear meltdown in mainstream ranks!!! This is the same problem they faced with the Hobbits of Indonesia. Remember those? The little dwarf-sized bipeds that also looked entirely non-human? Yet they, too, lived well within the cut-off point for so-called “prehumans,” the last of the Neanderthals at around 28,000 years ago. And keep in mind that the Neanderthals have skulls much more like both the Red Deer Cave people and the Hobbits. Neanderthals were nothing like humans as we are today. This problem is what created the infamous “Missing Link,” a mystery hominid that is often touted as being found, but never really is. There is NO possible “transition” species between Neanderthals and humans because the change in our cranial structure is so profound. Every single aspect is different. There are NO areas of direct, perfect corollary. Just as that is true with the Starchild Skull. There is not a single corollary with a human skull….NOT ONE! So the Red Deer Cave people are another form of Hobbit, and they will be treated the same. A way will be found to shoehorn them into the “human” category, where they will fit as well as chimps or gorillas might, and as the Hobbits have been forced to do. This is so science doesn’t have to face up to the possibility that humans are recent arrivals on Earth, not part of the native species, and that we might actually have been genetically engineered!!! [Those who want to know more about the idea that we humans were in fact engineered to be here on Earth, please check my heavily illustrated eBook about it, “Intervention Theory Essentials.” Well worth anyone’s time!] www.lloydpye.com/int… Scientists have gotten away with the Hobbit farce because Hobbits happen to be examples of the dwarf kind of hominoid that inhabits the band of jungles that circle the equator of the Earth. That is their natural habitat, and on the island of Flores , where they were found, the local name for the hair-covered pygmy primate that lives in the jungle is “Ebu Gogo.” Wherever hominoids are found, they have a local name applied by the natives that are aware of them and treat them like any other creature sharing their environment. The problem with the Red Deer Cave people is that they are more human sized, so the “dwarf deformed human” label to explain away Hobbits will not fly with the new discovery. It will have to be some other form of nonsense that will be foisted off as truth so this new problem can be swept under the mental rug of most people, along with the Hobbits. Speaking of the Starchild Skull…. We’re doing great with new interest on several fronts since the annoucement of the fragment recovered from its FOXP2 gene. If you have not read the essay about this yet, you really should. It’s 4,000 words and is available at: http://www.starchildproject.com/dna2012.htm. Takes 20 minutes to read. But the new news is found in this article: www.guardian.co.uk/s… It talks about the discovery that in all astronauts who spend extended time in space, they come back to Earth with noticeable distortion in the rear of their eye sockets, which changes the quality of their vision! This is a fascinating result of long-term exposure of humans in space, but it also applies to the Starchild Skull. One of its most noticeable features is the extreme shallowness of its eye sockets, making them absolutely nothing like human eye sockets, yet they are stunningly symmetrical and therefore meant to be built as they are. Your donations allow us to continue providing free public information about the Starchild Skull, maintain the StarchildProject.com website, and fund ongoing work with the Skull. Thank you for your support! Books From Lloyd Pye Starchild eBook: www.starchildproject.com/Starchild_eBook.htm Starchild paperback book: www.starchildproject.com/Starchild_paperback.htm Everything You Know Is Wrong: www.lloydpye.com/eykiw.htm Mismatch (hi-tech spy thriller): www.lloydpye.com/fiction.htm A Darker Shade Of Red (football novel): www.lloydpye.com/fiction.htm This message was sent to ad.johnson@ntlworld…. from: Lloyd Pye
