From: Andrew Johnson
Date: 2012-04-03 19:05:57
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=346&Itemid=60 New BBC Funded 7/7 Propaganda Piece in the Works Andrew Johnson ad.johnson@ntlworld.com – 03 Apr 2012 In May 2011 I was contacted by someone at Renegade Pictures in relation to their film “911 Conspiracy Road Trip” – in which Charlie Veich became involved and was “converted” back to believing the official story of 911 (and quite a bit of weirdness went with that). Today, I was contacted about what seems to be a similar “project” regarding the 7/7 bombings. I have anonymised the message below, but am posting this as “notice” of an upcoming BBC propaganda piece. I tried to summarise how I view these folks now. It was submitted by ***@renegadepictures.co.uk at 11:06:25 03-Apr-2012 ————————————————————————— Recipient: info@checktheevidence.com Message text: Hi Andrew, Im contacting you from a TV company called Renegade Pictures. I am working on a doc about people who think that the 7/7 bombings cannot be explained by the official report, which suggests that it was a terrorist attack committed in the name of Islam. We are currently in the process of casting for the prog, so are interested in looking for people who are between the ages of 18-35yrs who doubt the official account of events. Is there anyone who think might be keen to take part? Cheers ————————————————————————— —–Original Message—–From: Andrew Johnson [mailto: ad.johnson@ntlworld.com]Sent: 03 April 2012 18:52To: ‘***@renegadepictures.co.uk’Subject: RE: 7/7 ProgrammeHi there,I was contacted by your company last year re the 911 “road trip” film you made – and it is now clear what happened.In your message you wrote: > We are currently in the process of casting for the prog, so are > interested in looking for people who are between the ages of 18-35yrs > who doubt the official account of events. Well, we have been in the process of pointing out that the government’s (revised) narrative of the events of 7/7 cannot be true. This is the definitely the case (no “doubts” or “beliefs” are involved) – because the available evidence proves that the 4 alleged bombers cannot have committed the alleged crimes – someone else is responsible.I would like to point you in the direction of John Anthony Hill’s (JAH) film “7/7 Ripple Effect” which summarises the evidence which proves the official narrative of 7/7 is false.video.google.com/vid… could also cover that JAH was detained without trial (accused of attempting to pervert the course of justice) for 140 days and finally brought to trial after that period had elapsed (and after the so-called 7/7 inquest had finished) and he was acquitted by a jury (they were shown the afore-mentioned film).terroronthetube.co.u… the people I know are familiar with above story and, as far as I can tell, know that the BBC, news media and those production companies making films and documentaries NOT addressing this evidence are effectively (at best) then paid propaganda agents or (at worst) accomplices to a criminal cover up – being, as they are, complicit in attempts to pervert the course of justice.History will record this – and the dishonesty of those unable to report on and investigate these matters appropriately and accurately when they “should know better”. (A production brief given by a director or other person will not be seen as an valid excuse.)History will also record others, like JAH, who have studied the details and the evidence and presented it fairly and accurately to those willing to listen:www.richplanet.net/s… will be advising my contacts that a new BBC propaganda piece is in the works and they can then also “log” this as another attempt at smear, ridicule, distortion and so on in what is tantamount to fraud and conspiracy.You, as a researcher, have a choice: continue to be paid money to help pervert the course of justice – or perform research openly and honestly and refuse to contribute to the project in any meaningful way. (All persons working on this programme have the same choice – perhaps once you have done the research, you can present this choice to them.)I will be posting this on my website, deleting your name – so that you can privately make the choice above.RegardsAndrew Johnson
