From: Andrew Johnson
Date: 2013-12-07 14:49:59
Attachments : This posting (thanks to Bob Easton for passing it on to me) basically compares what was said to Lloyd Pye in 1999 about a DNA study of Humans – with a study by Dr Melba Ketchum on Sasquatch DNA – there is a startling similarity between the 2 studies – made independently, many years apart…. bf-field-journal.blo… Wednesday, April 10, 2013 What do the “DNA Deep Throat” and the Ketchum DNA Study Have In Common? I do not ascribe to Lloyd Pye’s theories concerning the origins of humans but I do find his work very interesting and thought provoking. I was watching one of his presentations when he mentioned what he called the “DNA Deep Throat”. This is a Geneticist that emailed him in 1999 with some very interesting assertions. Below is an excerpt from this email Pye received: “Dear Mr. Pye: I agree with your conclusions [that humans are genetically engineered] and will give you a few hints, if you wish [speaking] as a “DNA Deep Throat.” First, look up the huge discontinuities between humans and the various apes for: (1) Whole mitochondrial DNA; (2) genes for the Rh Factor; (3) and human Y chromosomes, among others. Regarding #3, I refer you to K.D. Smith’s 1987 study titled “Repeated DNA sequences of the human Y chromosome.” It says “Most human Y chromosome sequences thus far examined do not have homologues [same relative position or structure] on the Y chromosomes of other primates.” Human female X chromosomes do look somewhat apelike, but not the male’s Y. This means that if humans are a crossbred species, the cross had to be between a female ape-like creature [i.e, “creature of Earth”] and a male being from elsewhere.” Source: http://www.lloydpye.com/breakingnews_dnadeepthroat.htm What I find interesting is this sentence: This means that if humans are a crossbred species, the cross had to be between a female ape-like creature [i.e, “creature of Earth”] and a male being from elsewhere. When I read this I thought where I have read this before? Then it hit me, The Ketchum DNA study!, that is where I have seen something very similar. Dr Ketchum came to the following conclusion in her DNA Study: In summary, we have extracted, analyzed and sequenced DNA from over one hundred separate samples of hair, tissue, toenail, bark scrapings, saliva and blood obtained from scores of collection sites throughout North America. Hair morphology was not consistent with human or any known wildlife hairs. DNA analysis showed two distinctly different types of results; the mitochondrial DNA was unambiguously human, while the nuclear DNA was shown to harbor novel structure and sequence. All known ape and relic hominin species such as Neanderthal and Denisovan were excluded as being contributors to both the nuclear and mitochondrial sequences. Analysis of whole genome sequence and analysis of preliminary phylogeny trees from the Sasquatch indicated that the species possesses a novel mosaic pattern of nuclear DNA comprising novel sequences that are related to primates interspersed with sequences that are closely homologous to humans. These data clearly support that these hominins exist as a novel species of primate. The data further suggests that they are human hybrids originating from human females. This hybridization can be likened to humans with Denisovan admixture resulting from Denisovan males mating with human females. The same type of mating potentially occurred with Sasquatch; however, in the case of Sasquatch, the admixture is human. Though preliminary analysis supports the hybridization hypothesis, alternatively, it could also be hypothesized that the Sasquatch are human in origin, having been isolated in closed breeding populations for thousands of years. Nevertheless, the data conclusively proves that the Sasquatch exist as an extant hominin and are a direct maternal descendent of modern humans. Source: www.denovojournal.co… I was thinking WOW! Human DNA sequencing shows that the female was human or from earth and the male was from an unknown origin or “elsewhere”. Dr. Ketchum finds that Bigfoot (Sasquatch) is a human hybrid with what we know as “human females” and a “novel” or unknown male! This could not be a coincidence especially when you realize that the study that Pye is referencing was done in 1987 and he was made aware of this in 1999. Dr. Ketchum’s study was just published in 2013. Lloyd Pye also explains how the difference between our closest genetic relative on the planet differs by an astounding 30%, Pye writes the following: “In the 1987 study Deep Throat referenced in 1999, the term “most” was used when pointing out that human Y sequences do not match with the Y sequences of higher primates (chief of which are chimps, supposedly the closest genetic relative to humans). However, since then it has been well established that in all chromosome comparisons between chimps and humans, their differences average 2% to 3%. Yet the difference between their Y chromosomes is 30%! Obviously, something very dramatic happened to the human Y, something that can’t possibly be explained by standard Darwinian evolution. The only plausible answer is, in fact, genetic engineering, but we all know mainstream science would, at all costs, avoid openly considering that as a possibility.” Source: www.lloydpye.com/bre… This made me wonder, is the real reason the scientific community is savagely attacking Dr. Ketchum and the DNA Study related more to the Human Genome and the unexplainable anomalies rather than the existence of Bigfoot? Did Dr. Ketchum accidently stumble upon the “dirty little secret” that modern science has been trying to hide, that 30% of male “human” DNA just appeared and is not related to any other life on this planet? That her discovery of the Bigfoot being a human hybrid with an unknown male progenitor relates directly to the human genome and its “30% unknown”? That the human genome itself could prove scientifically that humans were genetically engineered by extraterrestrial beings or a Devine source (God)? Both of these scenarios are untenable for modern science and their belief in Darwinism, for this is their religion and it must be protected at all cost. You must admit it is an interesting hypothesis that is supported by more than just anecdotal evidence. The howls and gnashing of teeth coming from the critics tell you something more is going on here. The implications are “earth shattering” in many respects and I wonder if we as a society are ready for the implications if this hypothesis is correct? In the words of ole “Grandpa Jones” on the TV show Hee-Haw, “Truth is stranger than fiction”
