From: Andrew Johnson
Date: 2014-04-03 14:13:39
I had a brief exchange, copied below, with the same person who criticised the QEG information I sent round a few days ago. I think his response his interesting in that he cannot specifically point out errors in what Muammer Yidiz shows (even though it is apparently “Childs play” to spot). So I asked him about “the laws of physics” in a different scenario that I have spent quite a lot of time discussing. His response was again interesting in what it completely excluded. I never even saw Mr Yiddiz asking for money – perhaps because money would not help him really, as I have pointed out before – the “system” comes down on any projects which threaten to achieve commercial development. This person has been a subscriber to this list for over 3 years. From: Sent: 03 April 2014 12:10To: ad.johnson@ntlworld….Subject: Re: Magnet Motor – Muammer Yildiz Hi Andrew. The poor guy has spent twenty years working on a machine that doesn’t work. Sad. The net is full of unsuccessful, garage built less than unity devices. So far no Eureka. You have to actually come up with some new science that says how it might be done. That is how all inventors have made their machines. The science is there first, then the inventors exploit it. Not usually, if ever, the other way round. People forget that inventors are not research physicists…they are engineers of some kind trying to do research physics on the run with an investment to recoup. Most new science arises in the head of those sitting around dreaming of something else. Anyway it is amusing and, of course, I will be delighted when the laws of physics are turned on their head. On 3 Apr 2014, at 13:15, Andrew Johnson wrote: xxx, I think we may disagree on this one. Having watched the videos, my bet is that this device basically works – but it is not reliable. As an example, what laws of physics, that are known in the “white world” can be used to explain the disappearance of the towers? (And by that I am suggesting that the physics in devices like his show that it is possible to have a self-running motor). What laws of physics explain the operation of Stan Meyer’s device? Or do you think all these folks are incompetent/mistaken etc? Like I said, we may disagree on this (unless I’ve misunderstood you). Dunne if you watched “Infinite Energy, but not for the masses” – where I tried to lay out some evidence as I see it. www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=314&Itemid=55 Andrew From: Sent: 03 April 2014 13:29To: ad.johnson@ntlworld….Subject: Re: Magnet Motor – Muammer Yildiz Dear Andrew. The link is so sad that I think it is time for me to unsubscribe. These guys are frauds of the kind that is child’s play to spot. Any scientist or thinker/researcher knows how to spot obviously fake science. How come conspiracists are so gullible. I wish I could say I have seen something useful and true on your postings. I haven’t. You seem to fall for anything and have little powers of discrimination. Happy dreaming. Paul T. PS. How much are you betting on the machines working eventually. Not your wallet I will guess.