A response to PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Building 7’s Contro

From: Andrew Johnson

Date: 2014-06-02 08:27:43

I thought I would send this around so that you’re aware of the latest from the “2nd-tier cover up crew” From: Andrew Johnson [mailto:ad.johnson@ntlworld….] Sent: 02 June 2014 08:20To: ‘David R. Griffin’Subject: RE: PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Building 7’s Controlled Demolition: 9/11 Consensus Panel Releases New Evidence from Witness Testimonies and Architectural Drawings Dr Griffin,   Please can you disseminate truthful, complete and accurate information regarding 9/11 issues. As you well know, many crimes were committed on 9/11. Covering up evidence which would show who was really responsible for 911 is also a crime. Ignoring and not explaining evidence in relation to a crime is a crime (in this country we call it “attempting to pervert the course of justice”).   You may be surprised at the number of people who now realise that WTC 7 was not destroyed by controlled demolition – the seismic signature data alone proves this. Why on earth would you promulgate false information about this? NIST was advised of this in 2008 – here is the document on their website: www.nist.gov/el/disa… the most relevant part is copied here www.checktheevidence…)   This is posted in sections here: www.drjudywood.com/a… of this information was also posted here some time earlier: www.drjudywood.com/a….   I suggest you start including this information in your releases – as more people are starting to become aware of it anyway – in part due to our work over the last 6 – 7 years. Finely crafted though your release may be, it is little or no different the official government information releases as it misses out information and misrepresents many important facts. I hope you now realise that people are aware of this – and its implications for all of us.   Regards   Andrew Johnson UK From: David R. Griffin [mailto:davidraygrif@gmail.c…] Sent: 02 June 2014 07:37To: undisclosed-recipients:Subject: PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Building 7’s Controlled Demolition: 9/11 Consensus Panel Releases New Evidence from Witness Testimonies and Architectural Drawings PRESS RELEASE:  World Trade Center Building 7’s Controlled Demolition: 9/11 Consensus Panel Releases New Evidence from Witness Testimonies and Architectural Drawings   June 1, 2014 –The 24-member 9/11 Consensus Panel – which includes physicists, chemists, engineers, commercial pilots, attorneys and lawyers – today announced three new studies confirming the controlled demolition of World Trade Center 7. The studies scientifically refutes the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) claim that, for the first time in history, fire caused the sudden and complete collapse of a large, fire-protected, steel-framed building on 9/11. (Note that whereas the Consensus Panel uses a scientific methodology to peer-review its work, the NIST report was not peer-reviewed.) The first Panel study deals with the NIST computer simulations, which purported to show that fire-induced thermal expansion caused a girder to be pushed off its seat at Column 79, thereby initiating a global collapse of the entire 47-storey building at 5:21 in the afternoon.  However, a recent FOIA request has produced WTC 7 architectural drawings showing that the NIST simulations omitted basic structural supports that would have made this girder failure impossible. The second Consensus Panel study deals with NIST’s claim that it did not recover any steel from this massive steel-frame skyscraper. This is extraordinary, given the need to understand why a steel-frame building would have completely collapsed for the first time in history from fire alone, and to thereby prevent a recurrence. We know now that some of the steel was recovered.  Photographs recently obtained by researchers show the strange curled-up paper-thin WTC 7 steel, with a NIST investigator pointing it out. The third Panel study shows that on September 11, 2001, many people were told hours in advance that WTC 7 was going to collapse. MSNBC reporter Ashleigh Banfield said early in the afternoon: “I’ve heard several reports from several different officers now that that is the building that is going to go down next.” Many members of the New York Fire Department were confidently waiting for the building to come down: Firefighter Thomas Donato: “We were standing, waiting for seven to come down. We were there for quite a while, a couple hours.” Assistant Commissioner James Drury: “I must have lingered there. There were hundreds of firefighters waiting to — they were waiting for 7 World Trade Center to come down.”  Chief Thomas McCarthy: “So when I get to the command post, they just had a flood of guys standing there. They were just waiting for 7 to come down.” In addition, CNN and the BBC made premature announcements. This foreknowledge corroborates the evidence presented in previous Consensus Points (WTC7-1 to WTC7-5) that WTC 7 was brought down by controlled demolition.   Source:            The 9/11 Consensus Panel  consensus911@gmail.c…  @911consensus Contact List:    www.consensus911.org… Co-founders:    David Ray Griffin, Elizabeth Woodworth 

Related articles...

Comments are closed.