by Andrew Johnson – ad.johnson@ntlworld….
30 Sep 2014
This “event” was recently brought to my attention – from about 55 minutes till the end of this recording (archived here). I am highlighting this because Dane Wigington runs the Geoengineering Watch Website. So why did he not mention the very likely case of Geoengineering that took place around the time of 9/11?
For those not familiar with how often Richard Gage has lied, see this page. Proof of his lies can be seen and heard.
Why oh why doesn’t Wigington check his facts? Why is he joining in with the lies about evidence being denied? All he has to do is look at www.drjudywood.com/ or read the “Where Did the Towers Go?” Contents pages:
What hope is there if these basic lies continue to be promulgated by people like Wigington? Again, neither of them even talk about Hurricane Erin on 911! www.drjudywood.com/a…
Here is a partial transcript of the relevant portion of the interview/discussion.
Why is Dane Wigington singling out Dr Judy Wood in this manner? For “true believers” in thermite etc, what will they think when hearing Dr Wood’s name mentioned in this context?
If Gage is so convinced about thermite, why did he “pass” on putting it in the 2007 RFC? See here for more information 911thermitefree.blog… or read my free ebook tinyurl.com/911ftb. Evidence compiled by Dr Judy Wood was submitted to court in 2007!
Aside from 911 evidence itself, what Wigington said about Gage’s group is rather ridiculous – he talked about how many members had signed up for AE911 and how that validated what they said. This is ridiculous logic – 100’s of thousands of “experts” are “signed up” with the official story of 911 (and geoengineering issues). By DW’s logic, they must be right and everyone else must be wrong. Or should we just give him a “free pass” on 911 because he has a large audience on geoengineering issues…? Also, by DW’s logic, wouldn’t it be better if AE911 had even more members, because then what they said would be even more truthful…?
Because of my long past experience of dealing with people who tell some truth and then deceive, he has not given me a good basis on which to trust him or his research – if he’s made an honest mistake about 911, and corrects what he has said then fair enough, I will be able to look more deeply into what he has said.
If people who claim to be revealing truths about geoengineering don’t want to talk about Hurricane Erin and the events of 9/11, I cannot help but think this is strange. My experience up to now has shown me that the combination of what DW said and what he didn’t say amounts to an ongoing cover up of the events of 911.
It seems that several people have written to Dane Wigington about 911 and he has refused to acknowledge the evidence. Listen to this clip from 02 June 2015, which was sent to me by someone (who has similar interests in 911 and Geoengineering). It seems Hurricane Erin is a taboo for Mr Wigington…
For those interested in the “climate change issue” please download my free ebook here:
Also note that Wigington also “attacked” G Edward Griffin, who he worked with for a while Griffin is a long time researcher/speaker and author – and even made “World Without Cancer” in the 1970’s
There was similar bust up between Wigington and Michael Murphy a few years ago
I think Murphy was trying to do the right thing, but had his own problems (as you can find out with further research).