From: Andrew Johnson
Date: 2014-12-15 18:34:19
I’ve now read this book and posted a review on Amazon www.amazon.co.uk/rev… and have pasted it below. Having heard Rebecca Roth’s short interview with “The Writing Room” on YouTube, after I was sent a link by someone, I decided to buy the Kindle version of this book, which I have now read. It was an interesting book – covering a topic that I, too, have compiled a book about. In my own 10 years of research, I had not heard of Rebecca Roth, but I am familiar with many of the facts which are related in the narrative of the 2nd half of her book. The book reads well, and initially builds a fairly engaging story, centred around Vera – a flight attendant of many years experience. Vera has always had questions about the official story of 911 but following two terrifying aircraft/airline incidents which directly affect the fictional US president, Jim Sherman, she begins to re-investigate those events with the help of an old friend of her deceased husband. The first half of the book (more or less), just introduces the main characters in the story and how they are and become connected. This is essentially a build up to the second half, where some of the anomalies in the 911 story are discussed by these characters as they share their research. Most of their exchange of details centres around the plane/passenger anomalies (which was what I wanted to read about) and the alleged theft of gold from the WTC just before the towers were destroyed (a story which I have heard about, but not studied the evidence for). The scenario presented regarding what happened to the planes is intriguing, but is largely based on the alleged cellphone conversations which, as the narrative rightly points out, were used to generate the “hijackers” fable and implant it into the public consciousness soon after the events took place. The narrative makes the argument that these conversations were “staged” while the planes had been landed. Again, the narrative rightly points out that the observed damage at all 4 crash sites does not indicate that planes crashed there. One oddity in the story is where 2 of the characters pull a stunt with a wheelchair to demonstrate a “hole” in security procedures – yet the characters talk about the intrusive nature of TSA pat-downs and so on. So why advocate *further* security checks when they are uncovering a fraudulent story of hijackings? However regarding the plane stories, certain issues are overlooked in the narrative – such as “if the planes were landed somewhere, what did people in New York see crashing into the towers, and what was filmed there?” This is a question which I think can be answered by studying the research of Richard D Hall and his 3D Flight Analysis. Also, my article entitled “Going in Search of Planes in NYC” also offers some clues to fit into this story. Regarding the planes, the “what people saw” is really only covered in the narrative with the suggestion that missiles were fired – which may have been the case – though the evidence for this part of the theory isn’t really covered in the narrative at all well (it’s mainly covered in a conversation between Vera and someone who worked at the Pentagon). More troubling is the inclusion of a Physics Professor named Jonas and his “peer reviewed scientific paper” about thermite being used to destroy the towers. Similarly, the towers are described many times as having “collapsed”. The research of Dr Judy Wood (not mentioned or referenced anywhere in the narrative) shows the towers did NOT collapse. They mostly turned to dust in mid air. It seems the author is not familiar with my own research into this area of 911 evidence – that the thermite story was implanted to distract people away from the evidence which shows what happened to the towers. I have evidence in spades that this is true. Thermite is a bogus theory – and unlike Dr Wood’s research, none of the thermite evidence was put into a court case (i.e. those like Jonas promoting this evidence actually *know* they are lying). So overall, this is an interesting narrative and the president’s speech at the end is perhaps one we would all like to hear. But in the end, and I don’t mean this to sound cruel, insensitive or “wrong”, the stories of what happened to the planes some may consider as just a distraction – from asking the question “Where Did The Towers Go?” Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11. So please read that book, and mine! 911 Finding the Truth
