From: Andrew Johnson
Date: 2015-01-25 13:33:03
Attachments : A few people wrote to me pointing the “discovery” of the ill-fated Beagle 2 lander sci.esa.int/mars-exp… www.bbc.co.uk/news/s… just 1 or 2 days after Richard D Hall’s 2 “Mars Rover Hypothesis” programme aired. www.richplanet.net/s… www.richplanet.net/s… Study this image: news.bbcimg.co.uk/me… Then consider the blackness of Beagle 2’s solar panels… cnet4.cbsistatic.com… Does it “add up”? So this thing has been on Mars since 2003 and we have had Mars Reconnaiscence Orbiter photographing Mars since 2008 and Beagle 2 is discovered nearly on the same day as Richard puts out his programme? What are the chances…? Just in the last couple of days, we’ve seen another Daily Mail posting of an image from the Rover: www.dailymail.co.uk/… But it’s fairly easy to show this is a line of site effect (see attached). So why did Jennifer Newton not do some better research? (Easy to guess the answer to that). Jennifer Newton has put out other trashy articles: www.dailymail.co.uk/… So, as I said in one of the programmes, either there is really stuff on Mars that they don’t want folks to see/know about or the rovers are not on mars – which they don’t want people to know. So let’s distract them by mixing in the issue of UFOs etc and not talking about the actual evidence… or talk about the stuff that is easy to debunk… same old, same old…
