From: realiseyourefree
Date: 2015-03-09 22:19:16
Ben, you could always ask Mr Kollerstrom if he has reviewed his stance on the importance of ‘debate’ over the less the popular, but irrefutable 43 FACTS outlined in Chap 22 of Where Did the Towers Go? www.checktheevidence… appreciate that this is your show, but is the truth about debate and figures of popularity who because of their pig-headedness or some other agenda refuse to accept the facts. It may be interesting to see if NK will apologise to Andrew Johnson for accusing him of ‘psychotic-type remarks’, when all he was doing was presenting evidence, which has clearly been denied and smeared over/misrepresented with the assistance of Clare Kuehn.Why give this man air time, unless he can humbly apologise and help us on the path to getting Dr Wood’s work the rightful attention it deserves. Seems he is providing more of a distraction than to focus on very serious issues Dr Wood has given us. Does anyone really understand the implications of the WDTTG evidence and the s*** we’re really in!Does anyone read what Andrew has recorded?Regards In humble pursuit of truth by evidence not consensus. Hilary