From: jon_devlin
Date: 2015-04-21 16:57:31
Sorry Ben , I can see where your coming from but it will take a bit more than the say so of an ‘insider?’ and the fallacy of an ‘Appeal to Authority’ to quench my continued scepticism on the origins of UFOs. I think it unhelpful and don’t subscribe to either the label nor usage of the term ‘Nut’ even if it originates from within the so-called ‘Camp of the Nuts’ (As MSM would unfairly portray the UFO community). Neither do I give any extra credence to military personnel (nor those in Authority – unless they actually worked on UFO’s – but that would still be a claim unless they had proof aka Fouche ) as having some sort of edge in their ability to offer credibility to sightings? If you have eyes and a molecule of common-sense then you’re just as reliable a witness to a possible UFO sighting, in my opinion. I’d go further and say that you’re probably more credible, as your probably don’t have a potential contrived agenda and not as brainwashed or skewed in your thinking without a military background? My question would be has he filed a Whistle-Blower Law suit in Canada/US to expose the entities or knowledge/evidence he ‘claims’ to have?RegardsJohn
