From: jon_devlin
Date: 2015-04-30 16:37:36
Well, I’ve looked and thought about this and I’m not saying that some of the people do appear to bear an uncanny resemblance to their NASA-counter-parts and would be in keeping with the whole deceit and lies from NASA. But, I question the motive of this in the current “believe nothing on the Internet” its all fake that is going around on many conspiracy type forums and history discussions. What if the same resourceful Gov sponsored trolls are actually trying to discredit all alternative research by putting out credible and I don’t deny this as visually credible but still wrong and disinformation to get you me and others onto the band wagon. Then they select the particular dis-info piece that they decide to expose as dis-info and if soils the research that may be is 100% true? I firmly believe that Sandy Hook is one such dis-info exercise for the consumption of serious researchers that has firmly divided serious researchers between those that are ignoring the facts and primary source (because you can’t trust ANYTHING that the government agency says, right?) and those that have clearly read and reference the reports. But, what’s interesting is the number of so-called serious researchers that are on the wrong side on this and still believe in the nonsense and now appear to be so deeply associated with this that they may/will loose all creditability in their other correct research because of their error in this subject matter? And, just as in this potential NASA hoax the Sandy Hook Hoax proponents also have cited many similar convincing photos they would have us believe are of children that actually died?My thoughts anyway….
