Re: 9/11 Debate- Ben Emlyn-Jones vs Andy Mercer

From: Hilary Jane Kitching

Date: 2015-06-22 19:58:54

Ok, I see what you mean now Ben. To many people they may take it in the way it is first meant, as opposed to what you mean, but we are grateful for your efforts so looking forward to that show in September.  Shame you weren’t at Andrew’s last talk in Hull, we were looking out for you.  :-))Thanks Hilary     Hilary J Kitching MInstRE On 22 June 2015 at 19:10, benthejrporter@hotma… [Cognoscence] wrote:   Hi Hilary. I know “9/11 was an inside job” is a cliche for the thermitially correct brigade, so maybe for that reason it is tainted and loaded with baggage; but I personally don’t think this is a reason not to use it. The thing is I DO think 9/11 was an inside job in the literal sense of the phrase. “Inside” meaning people within the power-structures of those who the media leads us to believe were attacked. I know Dr Judy Wood never refers to this subject and concentrates on the “what happened?” rather than the “who did it?” This is fair enough and it’s going to be the basis of my own case in the debate too. However the purpose of the HPANWO notice was purely to make people aware that the debate is going to take place, nothing more- nothing less. I don’t see any need to begin putting across any of my argument within it. That will come later… and it should be fun! 

Related articles...

Comments are closed.