From: umami21
Date: 2015-07-03 11:07:27
I’m always fascinated by Nassim Haramein. Here he seems to explain gravity, among other “things”: For example: Nassim Haramein: Sacred Geometry And Unified Fields (Full Version) youtu.be/mFTMiVs4VhY Time in my view would be related to the density of the information flow between the basic space-time voxels in the universe, as well as gravity (which Nassim pointed out already). This flow will naturally decrease with distance from a body / planet, related to it’s geometry. I would suggest making a “flat planet” (en miniature) to validate it…. At 16:40 29.06.2015, you wrote: I’ve been listening to Roger Anderton who’s got some nice concise and lay person explanations as to why Einstein was wrong (knowingly to my knowledge) and the Modern Relativity science community are following probably knowing that the emperor is in fact starker’s! Anyway, I was interested in one of the things that even I, a non-science-type-person remember, that Clocks (Atomic) slow down at altitude and somehow this was linked (Incorrectly) to Relativity. I was curious as I thought this was one area that has been proven and backed up Einstein’s plagiarised ‘theory’? Here is Ron Hatch speaking I believe at an Electric Universe venue, about his specialist subject GPS technology and how Gravity/Kinetic Energy is what’s affecting their behaviour. RON HATCH: Relativity in the Light of GPS
