Re: FW: Sandy Hook truther to face jury

From: jon_devlin

Date: 2016-02-01 12:06:55

I hope Andrews status and integrity can move this forward?As you’ll know I’ve been trying to enlighten people within the ‘Alternative’ movement to the Hoax of the Sandy Hook Hoax and I’ve had virtually zero luck in getting the all too lazy people entrenched in this lie to even look at the copious evidence and particularly the work of Deanna, Keith Johnson and CW Wade. In fact I’d go so far as to say that most of this group of people’s have been lead into this false rabbit hole by the very same people that brought us, the R. Roths Fiction Book but it’s Fact?, Smallstorm muddling with Fluroide in the WTC, Fetzer and his diversion Mini-Nukes, thermite playoff etc etc and yet they’ve lambasted me for pointing out the 911 Rabbit hole and the Sandy Hook ‘No Children Died’ false Rabbit hole, are one and the same? I also see huge ego’s getting in the way of people admitting that they are wrong and they’d rather perpetuate this nonsense than admit (as I have) that they were duped, again! I was in the middle of outing and challenging John Friend on not looking or refuting Dr Wood’s work when I found that he too is pushing this Sandy Hook Hoax nonsense (Gun Control mumbo-jumbo) and challenged him on this to. He cited essentially the work of Tracey and Fetzer as his proof and wouldn’t even debate once I brought up Deanna’s name. He, John Friend has been hailed within the Christian Identity message area and I’ve had several fall-outs with people that will and cannot see past the individual to look at evidence. I get the same reaction when I bring up the subject of correct fact based ancient history and cite the works of Alan Wilson. Because people within the Ancient Biblical history have based their knowledge and understanding on the history as presented essentially by those that claimed to have deciphered and read the Egyptian Hieroglyphs “After the loss of the knowledge of hieroglyphic writing, the decipherment of hieroglyphs remained an enduring puzzle which would only be solved in the 1820s by Jean-Francois Champollion, with the help of the Rosetta Stone.”. This is provable nonsense i.e. the decipherment and indeed the interpretation of the Rosetta stone but we’ve all grew up believing it, as has the entire world history to date but it is wrong. So I’ve pointed this fallacy out within the Alternative movement/Christian Identity area and get either silence or attacking of Alan Wilson or me but not the Evidence. We’ll they’d have to Listen to dozens of hours of lectures and or read 8+ Books and that’s just too time-consuming isn’t it, easier to listen to other Key Opinion Leaders that have many years of opinion based radio shows and a proven research background in 911 Truth based on opinions?So what I’m saying is that when Andrew wrote his book on the 911 Technological cover-up, he was essentially mirroring the work of Alan Wilson (Historical and Bibical Cover-up), Bahram Blacket (Historical and Bibical Cover-up), , Immanuel Velikovsky (Ancient History, Biblical Cover-up, Space science cover-up), Bertrand Comparet (Biblical Cover-up), Deanna Spingola (Modern Historical Cover-up) and Dr Wood (911 Technological Cover-up). Its not new but its just as effective as it was 100’s/1000’s of years ago to the unsuspecting masses and I see it within this group and other groups today.

Related articles...

Comments are closed.