Yes Andrew, I know that you are obviously not Richard D. Hall. What a silly thing for you to suggest! I don’t ‘keep emailing you’ either, I’ve sent 5 including this one..At least get very basic facts straight, otherwise you’ll continue to look foolish. You can’t even count?
Richard’s confusion, and yours, about the types of aircraft involved are wholly relevant. The weight and size of an aircraft on hitting a building will obviously determine the amount of damage done to that building. You clearly know little about the laws of physics if you don’t even understand that very basic fact.
Thanks again for your contribution. Our email exchanges will be published in full, unless you object of course. If so then you’ll need to sue.
Enjoy your weekend.
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2018 8:44:13 AM
To: ‘N W’
Subject: RE: CheckEv Website Message
Not sure why you keep emailing me. Confusion over types of aircraft doesn’t affect the laws of physics. You might want to check that before you publish your book.
What we have been saying has been “out there” now for 10 years. The videos, witness testimony etc show the plane crashes on 911 weren’t real. If you want to try and debunk reality, it’s your choice.
Nit-picking over details doesn’t change what happened on 9/11 – despite what some researchers seem to want.
I won’t waste my time responding any more – as you seem to be someone who doesn’t want learn anything new about this issue.
Also, a major detail you have missed is that I am not Richard D Hall.
Good luck with your book – but make sure it’s accurate in every single detail (including what happened to the passengers) else you might be debunked…