Please feel free to share/repost this message to any relevant blogs/forums and social media groups you use.
I am sure I will receive some messages about this, as we approach the 18th anniversary of the public demonstration of weaponised “free energy” technology. So here are my thoughts and knowledge on the matter. Here is the actual report –
This is a limited hangout document – funded by AE911
The word “seismic” is mentioned in the report once. No reference is made to Dr Judy Wood’s research and, for example, her Sept 2008 submission to NIST regarding WTC 7 – she submitted a document to NIST over 11 years ago (it was even posted on their website at one time and may still be buried there somewhere for all I know).
Funding for that study was: $0.00. 3 years ago, ?I contacted J Leroy Hulsey (who compiled this “new” report) – he wasn’t really interested in the earlier research, nor what happened to rest of the WTC complex (see below).
Just think that $300,000 funding could have put maybe 10,000 copies of WDTTG into libraries around the USA/world. But, we should not be surprised that something like this did not happen. Let us remind ourselves of AE911’s vetting procedures.
From: J Leroy Hulsey <email@example.com>
Sent: 29 June 2016 09:13
Cc: Feng Xiao <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Zhili Quan <email@example.com>
Subject: RE: WTC 7 wasn’t controlled demolition…
Thanks for your input
Dear Prof Hulsey,
I am sure you’ve had quite a few emails about this, including one from a friend of mine, Mike Sacchetta. I will keep this very short and ask you to watch this 2 minute video:
This disproves the claim by AE911 that WTC 7 underwent conventional controlled demolition. The seismic signature recorded also disproves this. It also disproves NIST’s claim that the building collapsed as a result of fire (which would also have caused a lot of noise, and seismic effects).
I also have proof that AE911, as a group, are not what they might appear or claim to be. I can supply further details should you be interested.