Doctors Collaborate and Resist, ONS / Oxford Uni “Incentivise” Testing in the UK, ELR, Test Sensitivity Unknown,

Dr Simone Gold – HCQ Now “Allowed” again in some US states…

This week a Pennsylvania federal judge ruled that Governor Wolf’s lockdown orders were unconstitutional. It’s time to end the illegal lockdowns in other states. Please DONATE and share.…

We have engaged legal counsel to file lawsuits in California & Texas to challenge unconstitutional orders. If we raise enough funds, we also have counsel ready to file in New York. PLEASE consider donating to fight abusive Governors:…


World Doctors Alliance Online Congress – Dolores Cahill, Dr Mohammed Adil and Others – 5 hours!

I only watched part of this, but this seems to be part of a growing movement now……


They have formed their own group, to help stand up against what is going on.

Open Letter From Medical Doctors And Health Professionals To All Belgian Authorities And All Belgian Media.…

We, Belgian doctors and health professionals, wish to express our serious concern about the evolution of the situation in the recent months surrounding the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We call on politicians to be independently and critically informed in the decision-making process and in the compulsory implementation of corona-measures. We ask for an open debate, where all experts are represented without any form of censorship. After the initial panic surrounding covid-19, the objective facts now show a completely different picture – there is no medical justification for any emergency policy anymore.

The current crisis management has become totally disproportionate and causes more damage than it does any good.

We call for an end to all measures and ask for an immediate restoration of our normal democratic governance and legal structures and of all our civil liberties.

‘A cure must not be worse than the problem’ is a thesis that is more relevant than ever in the current situation. We note, however, that the collateral damage now being caused to the population will have a greater impact in the short and long term on all sections of the population than the number of people now being safeguarded from corona.

“With no disrespect, you are getting involved into something that you don’t understand”

I found this posted by John, who has been doing a lot of research into infectious diseases over the years. He had been concerned, like most of us, about the new checks being made, so he wrote to East Lancashire Railway (ELR) on 31/08/20.

Dear sir/madam (ELR)

Your temperature checking on those who enter your railway, seems to be an extreme form of social control. We should all realise that we are now being assaulted by an extreme form of government propaganda, which is leading the country into a third world war. Clearly, you are taking part in this war simply because you are under the influence of government propaganda. I accept that you are not alone. This certainly makes me consider whether I wish to continue on supporting the ELR.

I am also writing a complaint to Northern Rail, and when complete, I shall forward you a copy. This complaint covers the myth of infectious disease, which may sound incomprehensible to the uninformed, but which nonetheless, offers food for thought. One example happens to be flu, which is a sign of detoxification. We are led to believe that coughs and sneezes spread diseases, but this was never the case. A detoxification process cannot spread from one person to another, meaning that no human can possible ‘catch’ a detoxification process – it is impossible. This is why flu, as one example, is not a so-called ‘infectious’ disease. The science supporting infectious flu is theoretical, based upon theoretical mathematical models, based upon the deeply flawed Germ Theory – not based on the real world. What we have been doing for the last 100 years is the translate disease into infectious language. This translation was always theoretical. Coronavirus is no different. This is why, when we discover a high temperature, this is in no way proof of a so-called ‘infectious’ disease. With no disrespect, you are getting involved into something that you don’t understand, and possibly have little interest in, and also, you do not appear to comprehend the consequences of your actions.

John Wantling, Rochdale

UK – ONS and Oxford University COVID-19 Testing Info

Just over 1 week ago, I was contacted by Peter W because he had received a letter, like the one below (which he had promptly torn up). It gives an indication of the money being put into this part of the operation – because it appears you could earn £450 per household for being regularly tested. Of course, they would call it “incentivising” the testing. Another name for it would be “bribing”……


How do I take part?

1. Call IQVIA on 0800 085 6807. If you are unable to use the telephone, you can email iqvia.covid19survey@…

2. Call to register onto the study and a home appointment at your convenience will be confirmed in the next seven days.

3. A study worker will arrive at your home to complete the study.

The information you give us is protected by law and is treated as confidential.

How long will it take?

The first appointment will take 15 to 30 minutes per person.

What happens next?

If you are interested, we would like everyone in the household to repeat this study over either a month or 12 months – but you do not have to do this if you don’t want to. If you are interested, this will involve:

·         A visit once a week from a study worker to collect a nose and throat swab. This will happen for 4 weeks in a row, so 5 visits in total.

·         A visit once a month after this for 12 months in a row to collect a nose and throat swab.

·         As a thank you, anyone in your household who takes part will receive a voucher for each visit (£50 for the first visit, £25 for each further visit).

Thank you for your time.

Yours faithfully,

Iain Bell – Director General of the ONS[9]


When I researched who Bell was, a Mail On Sunday article was of the first things that came up (also referenced at the link just above).

A senior civil servant has caused a storm by claiming that ‘systemic racism’ exists in Britain and endorsing the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement in an email to hundreds of staff.

Just a coincidence that the fake protest movement gets mentioned here!

ONS on COVID Test Sensitivity

While looking for more information about the bribery, sorry, incentivisation of the testing, I came across this:…

While we do not know the true sensitivity and specificity of the test, as COVID-19 is a new virus, our data and related studies provide an indication of what these are likely to be. To understand the potential impact of false-positives and false-negatives, we have estimated what prevalence would be in two scenarios using different test sensitivity and the same specificity rates. The results of these scenarios show that when these estimated sensitivity and specificity rates are taken into account, the prevalence rate would be similar to the main estimate presented in Section 2: Number of people in England who had COVID-19.

 This really isn’t good enough, considering it is the basis under which cities or regions can be “locked down”…

 Public Health England Webinar from Feb 2020 – Discusses “Coercion” In Achieving “Behaviour Change”

 Thanks to Roshan for alerting me to this:…

At about 25 mins in, “Coercion” is discussed as a method of achieving a desired outcome (watch the rest of it to see the context). When the speaker started to describe “coercion” I was kind of expecting him to come up with some kind of “medical definition” which was different. Here’s what he said (transcript in a document with a title “Achieving Behaviour Change: A Guide for Local Government and Partners”:…

A word of warning about the terms that we’re using – we’re using those terms in a somewhat sort of technical way, so you have to look at the guide to make sure that you understand it. So, for example Coercion, it’s not about physically forcing people to do something, it’s about the kind of punishment and avoidance learning that you might put in place, or the threat of it, or the promise of it. Whereas Incentivisation is very much about providing positive incentives in order to do things and sometimes one is going to be appropriate and sometimes others.

Are we to assume the listeners didn’t have a particularly good grasp of the English language? Were they being prepared in a kind of subliminal way, for what was to follow, a few weeks later?

“You’re COVID-19 Positive – Even Though You Weren’t Tested!”

Another John sent me this – yes, crazy, but true:

My sister in Ireland relayed 2 first hand pieces of information to further substantiate what we in this group know already but it’s worth telling still.

1.      A family (who believe the whole CV19 pandemic) but are friends of sister told how they were contacted to be tested as a family, they agreed and the Adults and 2 teenagers were given £425 each, yes £1700 paid to take a nonsense test. They were all positive but hadn’t had any illness.

2.      Another family close to my sister and again unlike my family (believe the whole CV19 pandemic), they believed they had contact with one of these people with the deadly virus? They then contacted the testing station in Ireland, told to come at a certain time. Arrived but after a few hours couldn’t wait any longer. Drove home as a family, only to get a text message saying that they had tested positive! 

 So the nonsense test is able to test without actually testing and still give a positive.

 It would be laughable if it wasn’t having an adverse effect on me and my family and friends and it’s going to get worse, I believe.


This is not the first time I’ve heard this sort of account.



Look at “Recent Posts” on the website : www.checktheevidence…

Follow on Facebook:…

Follow on Twitter:…

Follow on Linked in:…

Or if you don’t use social media, you can use an RSS reader and use the link on the www.checktheevidence… site for RSS




Related articles...

Comments are closed.