Re: Probably Fake article – “Did Ringo Starr (Just) Admit Paul McCar

From: Hilary Kitching

Date: 2015-03-08 14:55:38

This one from Disclose.tv with a little twist at the end I never expected. Is it true?​http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/198451/FORMER_BEATLE_RINGO_STARR_CLAIMS_THE_REAL_PAUL_MCCARTNEY_DIED_IN_1966_AND_WAS_REPLACED_BY_LOOKALIKE/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=digest-2015-10&utm_source=crit_send     Hilary J Kitching MInstRE On 2 March 2015 at 22:21, ‘Andrew Johnson’ ad.johnson@ntlworld…. [Cognoscence] wrote:   Thanks to Paul for spotting this (from the original article):   worldnewsdailyreport…   “In an exclusive interview with the Hollywood Inquirer, Mr. Starr explained that the “real” Paul McCartney had died in a car crash on November 9 1966″ Only problem with that is that the Hollywood Inquirer doesn’t actually exist.   This is again typical of the way disinformation is. I know it’s uncomfortable for some people look deeply into this one – but like all the rest, its truth or falsehood rests on the available evidence – not on how much we liked the Beatles or their music (nor on “how they could have got away with it”.) As I commented to someone on Facebook.   “Just like 911 – couldn’t possibly be covered up or a false story about it successfully circulated for – say – 13 years. People would “find out”, right?”   “Consider what has been revealed about Jimmy Savile – in the 1980’s he was on TV every Saturday making kids dreams come true. But now we know some of what he was up to at other times. That is another example of a cover up that worked.”   So listen to and look at the evidence – as dispassionately as you can, and you will get closer to the truth.   www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=345&Itemid=83  But it’s OK – as the Daily Mirror has successfully debunked the PID evidence, right?    www.mirror.co.uk/usv…