Advertisement
Home arrow 9-11 and Fake Terror arrow Articles arrow Disinformation in Flight 175 Rare Video (Posted Sep 11 2013)
Disinformation in Flight 175 Rare Video (Posted Sep 11 2013) PDF Print E-mail

Andrew Johnson / Mark Conlon - 14 Sep 2013


Also See: 9/11 - What Happened at the WTC and How it is Covered Up and 

Markus Allen's Disappearing Buildings on 9/11 and

Flight 175 and The Truth about 'The Truth in 7 Minutes' in FIVE Minutes


Mark Conlon updated this article in Jan 2017. Below this version is the original version.


New Page 1

Disinformation in Flight 175 Rare Video (Posted Sep 11 2013)

 

Andrew Johnson / Mark Conlon - 14 Sep 2013

 

 

Recently, a "Rare Video" of Flight 175 apparently hitting WTC 2 on 911 was re-circulated. This was originally shot by Michael Hezarkhani. In this video:

 
Though the video correctly states that the way the crash and explosion happens is impossible (if a normal plane was involved), the thrust of this video is that it must be fake, because the plane wing passes behind a certain building when it should not be able to do this, because it is claimed the building in question is behind WTC 2.

 



A short analysis by Mark Conlon clearly shows that this conclusion is not correct. See below this for additional information.

 

 

The picture below shows the Michael Hezarkhani video with the two buildings in question which Markus Allen claims the plane’s wing passes behind.

 

 

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Sx0svj1wExA/V5jeyVeSisI/AAAAAAAADvg/hKyKZ2VFvRYP7UcMpoY5IgVyOJ3EB3sswCLcB/s640/Herzarkhani%2Bcnn2.jpg

 

In the picture below it will help us to understand the two buildings location in relation to the South Tower in Michael Hezarkhani video.

 

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-C8kF3hdzI30/V5jfE_9UimI/AAAAAAAADvo/M_jwrzqykA8d7aDBcH-FCRSp8t4Cc0ZQQCLcB/s640/wtc_1999BC.jpg

 

 

 

 

The picture below also helps to demonstrate the location of the two buildings in question in relation to the Twin Towers at ground level. They are located to the right of the Twin Towers.

 

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-4A97Vttihw0/V5jfg5NolpI/AAAAAAAADvw/WAWhwz6fVrUrtBb4jHQEvb1UsV_kLTRnwCLcB/s640/WTC-looking_north2%2B-%2BAnalysis%2BComplete%2BVersion.jpg



Below I have inserted the plane’s trajectory into the picture to demonstrate how plane’s wing should have passed behind the two buildings in question, when you consider Michael Hezarkhani’s location on board the ferry at Battery Park.

 

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-l6vtvckws6U/V5jfpitgMWI/AAAAAAAADv0/8G2UHH3zNsEyse2CrYUxsWptfwd0jaAZwCLcB/s640/WTC-looking_north2.jpg

 

 

 

The picture below plots Michael Hezarkhani’s location and the location of the buildings in question and also the plane trajectory.

 


 

Although the two buildings appear to the left in the Michael Hezarkhani video still image below, they are in fact as I have established to the right and in front of the South Tower, this optical effect is due to the parallax viewing position of Michael Hezarkhani.

 

 

 

To understand how Markus Allen made this error, and misrepresented the buildings location we must understand how parallax views work. Please see the picture below to help understand parallax viewing perspectives.

 

Parallax is a displacement or difference in the apparent position of an object viewed along two different lines of sight.

 

 

In the picture below the buildings appear to be to the left of the South Tower, when in fact they are really located to the right. Depending on the point of reference as in the picture below where Michael Hezarkhani is located, the buildings will appear to be to the left of the Towers. This is called parallax viewing. If the camera perspective was located more to the left, then the two buildings would appear to move more to the right. This is how simple errors are made due to not understanding parallax viewing perspectives in videos and photographs.

 




 

 

 

 

 

In conclusion:


The plane’s wing should have passed behind the buildings in the foreground in the Michael Hezarkhani video, and not in front as Markus Allen claims in his video where he misrepresented the buildings location. He also didn’t take into account Michael Hezarkhani’s location and viewing perspective. It is clearly demonstrated that CGI or video fakery was used in this video, but more of an attempt to discredit the Michael Hezarkhani video, and call into question the legitimate evidence captured within it. Unfortunately Markus Allen has shared his video far and wide across the internet, where it has been re-circulated by people unknowingly promoting the false information contained in it in the video, which I feel was the deliberate objective of Markus Allen himself to promote ‘video fakery’.

 

 

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-2fxJOHVWZKY/V5jgFgkwLzI/AAAAAAAADv8/8zrm3uv5tC4kyUdF42Q9zSmxISe3Y14WgCLcB/s640/Mark%252520Conlon%252520-%252520Building%252520Position%252520Analysis%2525203.jpg

 

 


Andrew Johnson:

In large part, thanks to Richard D Hall's analysis, linked above, it has become clear video fakery doesn't explain the discrepancies in the plane stories and evidence. Another person who has strongly promoted the video fakery and "crisis actors" scenarios is Simon Shack, whom I wrote about here: 

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=349&Itemid=60

 

This article (deliberately) tied in with the release Richard's updated analysis. Following my circulation of some of the content of this short piece, I was contacted by Mark Conlon, who had already researched the points argued in the "Rare Video" about the plane wing going behind the building - hence the inclusion of his work above. He has also made a short video including the information above: https://youtu.be/AKWqLBvI1yI

 

 

 



Original Version of this article:


Recently, a "Rare Video" of Flight 175 apparently hitting WTC 2 on 911 was re-circulated. This was originally shot by Michael Herzakhani. In this video:

Though the video correctly states that the way the crash and explosion happens is impossible (if a normal plane was involved), the thrust of this video is that it must be fake, because the plane wing passes behind a certain building when it should not be able to do this, because it is claimed the building in question is behind WTC 2. 

A short analysis by Mark Conlon clearly shows that this conclusion is not correct. See below this for additional information

The video was featured in Uncensored Magazine and on the "before it is news" site. This video is almost certainly it is the work of Ace Baker - whom I have written quite a lot about in my articles in 911 Finding the Truth - http://tinyurl.com/911ftb, but has been re-posted on Markus Allen's YouTube channel. I also talked about the Herzakhani video, about which there are many questions, in my presentation called "911 Finding the Truth", which is included on the page just linked.

 
If you read the chapters in my book about Ace Baker and Jim Fetzer, you may understand that they are part of the cover up. Video fakery is, to a large extent, another "red herring" to divert people away from the use of some other advanced technology - please see Richard D Hall's analysis here: http://www.richplanet.net/911.php

Markus Allen has also posted this video:

Quite a professional job. You will quickly spot a few recognisable faces in YouTube still in this posting which includes the above video:

http://www.truthin7minutes.com/controlled-opposition-how-to-spot-a-fake-leader

The video is quite professionally done, I think - certainly very engaging in its style of presentation.

In large part, thanks to Richard D Hall's analysis, linked above, it has become clear video fakery doesn't explain the discrepancies in the plane stories and evidence. Another person who has strongly promoted the video fakery and "crisis actors" scenarios is Simon Shack, whom I wrote about here: 

 
This article (deliberately) tied in with the release Richard's updated analysis. Following  my circulation of some of the content of this short piece, I was contacted by Mark Conlon, who  had already researched the points argued in the "Rare Video" about the plane wing going behind the building - hence the inclusion of his work above. He has also made a short video including the information above:

So the message is again, it is easy for disinformation to be deliberately inserted into material which has perfectly valid and legitimate conclusions in it.

 




*** PLEASE *** SHARE ON FACEBOOK ETC
Del.icio.us!Facebook!StumbleUpon!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites! title=
 
< Prev   Next >