To US Attorney General: hydroxychloroquine clinical trials intentionally murdering people?
Thanks to Andrew Wheway for this link:
This is closely related to a UK Column Posting:
What can we conclude from all this? It seems the WHO, the MHRA, Inserm, and public health bodies around the world have used fake science, fake data, deliberately destructive studies and what appears to be wilful ignorance to make sure hydroxychloroquine is never trialled as a preventive COVID-19 treatment.
The repeated statements, from numerous sources, that there is no scientific evidence to justify the use of the Marseilles Treatment as a prophylactic treatment for COVID-19 are risible. Should it ever be widely acknowledged as effective, the already spurious argument for a COVID-19 vaccine would be wholly untenable.
Only the most naive could imagine there aren’t many powerful individuals, foundations and institutions, including governments, who wish to stop the preventive treatment efficacy of HCQ+AZ with zinc ever being proven.
Wearing a Mask Can Reduce Your Blood Oxygen Level to a Dangerous Level – From US Attorney, Leigh Dundas
Thanks to Kathy for this info.
From US Attorney, Leigh Dundas
First, a disclaimer: this email does not constitute legal or medical advice, nor the formation of an attorney-client relationship. Please feel free to make use of this information, as needed, in your own lives.
Letter sent to the Supervisors of Orange County, California:
NOTICE: 6/9/20 Mask-Wearing Caused DANGEROUS Drops in Oxygen Levels in OC Residents
I wish to thank you again for taking the time yesterday to focus on the mandatory mask order. As I was inside the building when the OC residents decided to begin donning masks on the County Hall steps, it was not until this morning that I was presented with the data.
At the request of certain educators in OC, I summarized the data in an email. I am forwarding that email (below) for your review as well. Given this information, I am hereby requesting an immediate response by OC Health Department to the effect that mask wearing – which causes such precipitous drops in oxygenation – is healthy. Frankly, I doubt that such a statement can or will be forthcoming, given that every medical study worldwide holds that catastrophic medical situations and death occur in these low oxygen ranges.
If no statement can be propounded by OC Health Department – that it is medically safe for one to have oxygenation levels below 92% – then I would expect an immediate retraction of the Department’s order IN FULL regarding mask wearing. Even “recommending” such an action – now that we are all on notice that mask wearing for even a few minutes creates immediate and dangerous hypoxemia – puts OC residents at risk of catastrophic organ failure and death, with untold liability facing the Board and its agencies for same.
Leigh Dundas, Esq.
Leigh’s email to the Orange County Board of Supervisors on the same day:
Provided below is a brief list of new studies from recent days — but at the outset of this email I want to take a brief detour to summarize the results of what happened to OC residents wearing masks yesterday. This is a MUST READ BEFORE ANY EDUCATOR EVEN BEGINS TO CONSIDER MANDATORY MASKING OF STUDENTS OR TEACHERS.
On Tuesday, June 9, 2020, OC residents turned out en masse to the Board of Supervisors meeting to protest the mandatory mask order. At the meeting the health officer provided zero medical-scientific data that mandatory mask-wearing was safe, particularly during summertime high temperatures, or in the context of young children – nor could he provide any study showing mask-wearing is effective at containing viral transmission in order to combat the myriad studies showing it is NOT effective at viral containment.
At the meeting numerous doctors, attorneys, educators, psychologists, parents, and concerned residents cited medical studies on the harms from mask-wearing. So upset were these residents by the failure of the health officer to rescind the medically-unsubstantiated mandatory mask order – which intransigent position also drew hours of heavy fire from the Supervisors – or even to provide any studies showing efficacy of mask-wearing, that the residents proceeded to go outside onto the steps of the County Hall, at noon, in the 100 degree heat, and put on the “mandated masks” while using a Pulse Oximeter to measure their oxygen levels and heart rate.
The results were nothing short of horrifying:
ALL of the individuals had their oxygen rate drop from a healthy 98 or 99% (without the mask) – a total of five, ten, and sometimes twenty full points – within a few minutes of mask-wearing. Medically, below 92% is considered “dangerous” – while below 90% oxygen merits a denomination of “hypoxemic” The AVERAGE drop of these OC residents in oxygenation was more than 12 points, into the hypoxemic range.
Two of the participants, one a very fit daily runner, and one a very fit nurse, had their oxygen rates drop into the 70s – where organ damage, systems failure, and death can occur. ALL participants suffered dangerous drops in oxygen: 43% fell into the “dangerous” zone, 29% in the hypoxemic zone, and 29% fell into the extremely dangerous hypoxemic zone (where cardiac arrest, organ failure and death occur.) Even those who just stood around in the masks doing absolutely nothing had frightening drops in oxygen levels. As context, most of the participants were in decently good health, and not overweight. I’m sure I don’t need to extrapolate for the reader what could happen if this test were performed with an average cross section of citizens, i.e., with the nearly 40% of OC residents who suffer from at least one chronic health condition, and with the more than 20% of OC residents who are obese. It is a striking juxtaposition to note that Medicare and most insurance companies will pay for people with oxygen rates of less than 88% to get supplemental oxygen and all carriers and health experts advise you to seek immediate medical intervention below 88% – and the average oxygen rate was two points less than that at 86% after only a few minutes of mask-wearing.
Given the data from yesterday, let me underscore once more in no uncertain terms, and in language that is absolutely unmistakable: the liability that an OC School District or Board will be facing if it mandates mask-wearing for students or teachers is truly incalculable, in the event the mask-wearing causes a drop in oxygen (which we now know it likely will), which then leads to a medical complication or death. We have no idea what will happen to children who are made to wear masks in the triple digit weather of mid-August, but my guess is that their systems, being less developed and often more sensitive — compounded by the fact that children are notoriously poor at self-regulation and are traditionally MUCH more active than adults — will fare very badly indeed. Recent headlines have made quite clear that death of children and losses of consciousness can and do occur: nypost.com/2020/05/0… and 7news.com.au/lifesty… and nypost.com/2020/04/2….
Let me now turn to the original reason for writing this email, which was to provide you a Summary of Medical Data (June 2020) from Switzerland, which further throws into serious question why educational agencies would make any changes to school protocols – if we are not similarly prepared to make massive overhauls based on the flu season each year (which seasonal flu actually affects children more than COVID does):
• “According to the latest immunological and serological studies, the overall lethality of Covid-19 (IFR) is at most 0.1% and thus in the range of a strong seasonal influenza (flu).”
• “Even in the global “hotspots”, the risk of death for the general population of school and working age is typically in the range of a daily car ride to work.”
• “The median or average age of the deceased in most countries (including Italy) is over 80 years and only about 4% of the deceased had no serious preconditions. The age and risk profile of deaths thus essentially corresponds to normal mortality.” swprs.org/a-swiss-do…
Also, New England Journal of Medicine notes that masking is ineffective in community settings, and that even in healthcare arenas, its highest and best use is not to reduce viral transmission but people’s anxiety:
• “The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a REFLEXIVE REACTION TO ANXIETY over the pandemic…. Expanded masking protocols’ greatest contribution may be to reduce the transmission of anxiety, over and above whatever role they may play in reducing transmission of Covid-19.”
New England Journal of Medicine (May, 21, 2020).
Finally, the World Health Organization came out yesterday (June 8, 2020), concluding in NO UNCERTAIN TERMS that asymptomatic patients are NOT spreaders of the virus, which simply confirmed what earlier studies in May had found. Accordingly, we should NOT be worried that Little Johnny is going to catch the virus and bring Covid home to kill Grandma. Put simply: masking and social distancing are unnecessary, will create more medical and psychological damage than benefit, and are unneeded as healthy people and asymptomatic positive people DO NOT SPREAD THE VIRUS (so just keep the sneezy-coughers out of class — which is standard — and we will be just fine):
• “Coronavirus patients without symptoms aren’t driving the spread of the virus, World Health Organization officials said Monday, casting doubt on concerns by some researchers that the disease could be difficult to contain due to asymptomatic infections. ‘We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing,’ she said. ‘They’re following asymptomatic cases. They’re following contacts. And they’re not finding secondary transmission onward. It’s very rare.'” www.cnbc.com/2020/06…
Leigh Dundas, Esq.
The masks study video: youtu.be/WqhwwLbNZqo
The history of social distancing and the harm of using it in schools: youtu.be/NWh99sSF2Zs
Adding to this, I repeat a 40-second video from an earlier posting, www.bitchute.com/vid…. Transcript below.
Matt Hancock – 24 April 2020 – Online Interview
“The evidence for the use of masks by the general public – especially outdoors – is extremely weak…”
Government Briefing Statement on 24 April 2020
The evidence on facemasks has always been quite variable… quite weak, quite difficult to know and there’s no real trials on it.
Chris Whitty – 4 March
In terms of wearing a mask, if you don’t have an infection really reduces the risks… almost not at all…
28 April 2020 – Government Briefing
The recommendation from SAGE is completely clear – which is that there is weak evidence of a small effect in which a face mask can prevent a source of infection going from someone who is infected to the people around them.
Chris Whitty on 11/5/2020
“The great majority of the population won’t die from this. A proportion of the population won’t get the virus at all. Of those who get symptoms – 80% mild or moderate. Even the very highest risk groups – the great majority if they catch this virus will not die”.
Chris Whitty (Chief Medical Adviser to the UK Government)
An advisory leaflet/document from a Journal of American Medicine Website:
Face masks should not be worn by healthy individuals to protect themselves from acquiring respiratory infection because there is no evidence to suggest that face masks worn by healthy individuals are effective in preventing people from becoming ill.
More Predictive Programming (from 2014 – UK Channel 4)
UK Channel 4 – Skip to 2 mins mark if you want to avoid the commentary and intro – which doesn’t add much.
It was a Channel 4 series from July 2014 – www.imdb.com/title/t…
Public Information Film (Spoof):
Things are so crazy that they could almost broadcast this and people might think it was a real “Information Film”