It’s funny how things come together sometimes. Over this weekend, I have been tinkering around (as I occasionally do) with an old bit of hardware – a Nintendo Wii games console – which can now be easily hacked to make it do some “non-gaming things.” Hacking computer game tape loaders was one of my earliest activities in home computing (back in the 1980s), as well as writing a few simple games in BASIC. In looking at hacking the Wii and downloading some files, I came across my own “Disqus” profile. Curiously, all my comments which have been posted through this Web Service – on a number of different websites – appeared at the right hand side of the screen! (Without me clicking anything). In reading down through them, 2 patterns were obvious to me…
- Most of my online comments were about 9/11 and Climate change
- Quite a few of them were either removed or never approved.
Neither of these are surprising to me, but it made me pause for thought when 2 of my interests “came together” on my screen, unexpectedly. I have pasted some of my “Disqus” comments below (so you can see which were “permitted” and which were “censored”) . Note, as regards “Disqus”, it isn’t that service that censors the comments – it’s the website moderators/owners.
Unfortunately, this article promotes disinformation – and even uses an obviously doctored image in the headline… wow. Is that a way to find the truth? If you want to know what happened, and how disinformation like that shown above has been advanced, please watch all the videos on this page: . Read a summary and read my free ebook
Indeed and I talk about the later Project Stormfury here:
Lots missing from many websites.
An interesting case – shame he didn’t have a camera too. Edgar Mitchell was not being totally honest and he didn’t walk on the moon, sadly. The UFO/ET field is rife with disinformation – and it even comes from supposedly impeccable sources like Mitchell (and there are plenty of other examples). 9/11, energy and the moon hoax all need thorough investigation if you want to get to the truth.
And I ask are these energy bursts artificial? One thing that Dutchsinse never mentions is what happened on 911. Few people will talk about this. See here for details:
A comprehensive muddle up – the author wants to confuse and confound and he makes no reference to the evidence which proves no thermonuclear devices were used to destroy the WTC. i.e. little heat, no light and no sounds. Are barometric bombs or nukes silent? Pathetic that anyone should be taken in by this nonsense – and also sad that the author should expend so much time deceiving people. See if you want to learn some truths….
– there wasn’t an image for time 01:06. The instrument which produces the yellow tinted images (EUVI284) takes them every 2 hours, I think. One of the other instruments (EUVI304) takes them about every 20 mins and the closest to 01:06 is this one
. However, compare that to the image shown above and the pattern of flares/prominences and disk features is different to that image shown in the article (and it’s not sourced either). Comparing the orangey and yellow images for the same time shows the disk features of light and dark regions match closely. Hence the image in that article seems to be bogus (and the pattern of light/dark regions does not match the date/time given).
Fab work Ste. It’s so awful that folks like you have to do the investigation for no money – because the folks that should do it can’t do it and are bought and paid for or get killed. Thanks for putting it together. One comment is that in some places, I didn’t have time to read the text before it disappeared off the screen. Another is that I wasn’t sure, in the final section which pictures went with which caption. I sent this page to Richard D Hall anyway.
Plenty of robotic humans around already though – and they’re already willing to do the bidding of some hidden higher authority. Hundreds of examples to be found, once you’ve done the research….
“Go to the Bighorn Basin of Wyoming,” it’s a bit far for me – about 4,000 miles or so! 🙂 Good info though!
Yep – look at the evidence, check Dr Wood out (and me too!) 🙂
Absolutely Dave – just look at the evidence – either in this video, or in the book. No need to “buy” into anything or think about “niches”.
Hmmm another anonymous noise generator – not pointing out any errors in this presentation. And your name would be? Submitted a court case based on the evidence you have studied did you? Or are you just another distraction or a liar like so many others?
Heck looks like I am the only one in these comments who has the courage to use their real name!! Why would that be?