The Q-Anon Phenomenon
Is Someone Playing a “Trump Card?”
09 Sep 2020
“Only puny secrets need protection. Big discoveries are protected by public incredulity.”
Most “conspiracy” researchers, who have peeled back the veneer of TV reality, would agree that what is beneath the veneer is almost without exception, something “negative.” We become quite used to finding that powerful (often elite) interests are working to either exploit, deceive, attack, harm or even “reduce or diminish” the general population in some way – physically or psychologically.
It is generally much more rare to read of a “positive conspiracy” – where there is a clandestine group working for positive ends – to empower and liberate people from the spiritual and physical slavery to which they have been subjected, for much of their lives. Most of us “reality analysts” are more likely to suffer from paranoia rather than pronoia (the latter being the belief that “someone is out to help you”).
It must have been 2017 or 2018 when I first heard of “Q” or “Q Anon” – which was alleged to be some type of anonymous entity that was leaking information about the secret machinations, which are the real backdrop of geopolitics. I wondered if this was some new version of “Anonymous” – allegedly a group of hackers that were fighting to either correct or punish injustices created by certain individuals, organisations, companies, governments etc.
Q Anon was mentioned to me in a positive and serious light by at least two people whom I considered to be good researchers and/or trustworthy people. However, the basic “clandestine helper entity” premise seemed hard to believe – and reminded me of something called NESARA (which I will mention later).
It wasn’t until April or May 2020 that I “delved into” Q Anon a bit more and I watched a video called Ultimate Q Proofs Volume 1.
This video explained some of the history of Q and how someone, posting anonymously as “Q” on a popular forum called 4 Chan, was disclosing certain insider information to the public – through a “back channel.” According to a BBC article, posted on 20 Aug 2020, the anonymous user said they had a “Q Clearance.” As is usually the case with mainstream articles which challenge some of the fundamental assumptions which the mainstream outlets rely on to keep themselves from being exposed as “controlled propaganda outlets,” the words “belief” and “believers” are regularly used in discussing the story – rather than words such as “evidence,” “analysis,” “corroboration,” “verification” and so on.
The “Q Proofs” video, mentioned above, is one which differentiates “belief” and “evidence” – supplying plenty of the latter, to validate many of the points it makes. Indeed, it was this video and the photos, videos and quotes within it which convinced me that “Q” is, indeed, somehow connected to the Trump administration and able to pass messages to (and presumably from) it – resulting in some kind of public verification of such message passing. However, the way things are set up, the Trump Administration maintains a position of “plausible deniability” in relation to “Q.”
Martin Geddes on Q Anon
Thanks to a chap called Brendan Houlihan, I was made aware of the work of Oxford Maths Graduate and Computer Scientist and Comms and Networking specialist, Martin Geddes. Martin comes across as a highly intelligent, diligent and experienced researcher, with a varied background and skill-set. He has been writing about Q Anon since at least 2018. On a page devoted to his “Q” articles, he writes…
I very much identified with this short description – which accurately describes my own “truth-finding journey.” I can recommend other articles on Martin Geddes’ site (not about Q Anon) as being insightful, thought-provoking and impeccable in their reasoning and logic.
For those quickly wanting to get a flavour of Martin’s conclusions about Q Anon, they can listen to two interviews done by Robert David Steele on 15th and 20th Aug 2020. However, it would be better if you read Martin Geddes – 40 page PDF – because Robert Steele constantly interrupts Martin and so he can never finish an answer. In this PDF essay collection, Geddes gives a brilliant analysis and overview of Q Anon. He also clearly understands the backdrop to the Q Anon phenomenon:
After briefly describing the online/cyber environment where Q Anon “was born,” Geddes summarises the Q Anon phenomenon thus:
Hence these “Q drops” are disclosures about what the “white hats” are doing and they are using online forums as a “back channel” to communicate directly to people, rather than people being subjected to “information and knowledge filtration” by the controlled, mainstream sources. In his second essay “on Q,” Geddes writes (and I concur):
Geddes discusses what Q’s objective seems to be:
Geddes rightly points out the need for some scepticism:
So, what evidence is there that Q is actually a real/credible source – and that they have a connection to Donald Trump (aka DJT or POTUS – President of the United States)? Geddes notes:
A fair number of these apparent verifications (and others) are shown in the “Q Proofs” video, above – and they seem quite strong to me. A few more significant examples are shown in this presentation, based on an interview between “Charlie Freak” (which could be a pseudonym) and Mark Devlin:
Geddes argues that by studying the “Q drops” carefully, one can determine that:
Remember, this is being stated by someone who has graduated from Oxford and worked for decades in the IT/Telecomms industry. Geddes makes many highly significant and very well observed points which match conclusions that I have come to, independent of whether Q Anon is a real source or not. Geddes accurately describes the “information landscape” that is apparent to anyone who has undertaken the process of independent, deep and wide research, which has only become possible in the last 15-20 years.
Usefully, Geddes includes a list of “25 questions to ask yourself about Q.” For example, Geddes asks of the Mainstream Media (MSM):
Geddes makes many other compelling and revealing points about the relationship between the “Q Anon world” and the “MSM World,” such as:
He also notes at least one example of where a more mainstream (but online only) publication has tried to more accurately cover the Q Anon phenomenon. In a 14 Jan 2020 article titled “An Introduction to Q”, posted on the “American Thinker” website, Deborah Franklin writes:
Geddes lists a few verifications that Trump is, indeed, connected to the Q source, thus:
A Few Questions for Martin Geddes!
After reading the PDF file of essays that Martin had skilfully compiled, I asked if he would do an interview, he politely declined, due to ongoing commitments and other issues, but was kind enough to answer a set of questions I sent him, by email. Some of these questions are, of course, motivated by my own research interests.
In order to get Martin Geddes’ thoughts on what the Q/Trump operation might actually be for, I asked him whether he thought it could be a way of “collapsing” the old system of global control before a new one is implemented/rolled out:
So Geddes seems to at least accept the idea that Q Anon could be a “honeypot” to attract disaffected/disillusioned people into a new false narrative – with Trump and his Q Anon associates being either a “Messiah and his disciples” acting to save the world, or as a kind of “cavalry” (depending on your preferred metaphor). Later, we will see that in a more recent press conference, Trump was directly asked a question relating to this “metaphor.” Returning to my questions to Martin Geddes, I asked:
Once again, I found Martin Geddes’ answers and logic compelling and in close agreement with my own conclusions. For example, considering the lies that have been promulgated about the “Coronavirus” in 2020 – and how many have actually conspired to preserve a false narrative, I can only conclude that if the whole truth comes out, government authorities, NGOs, media organisations and Universities could not survive – as all of them have played a role in damaging or “downgrading” the lives of millions of people, worldwide, for no other reasons than protecting a false narrative.
Let us now turn our attention to one or two examples of unusual statements and “tweets” that Donald Trump has made, which seem to indicate a radically different image of the 45th President of the USA than most mainstream sources would like people to see…
DJ Trump, Corona Virus and Cardinal Vigano
The idea that Trump was, himself, using Twitter as a kind of “back channel” for public communications seem to be illustrated to me in this tweet:
In this letter, Cardinal Vigano writes:
I was quite taken aback that Donald Trump would tweet a link to this letter! Who in the media would characterise POTUS as a “conspiracy theorist…”?
DJ Trump – Saving the World??
The cynical and jaded among us scoff and laugh at the idea that a “secret group” (whether they are associated with DJT or not) could be trying to “save the world” from the evil forces/entities mentioned in Cardinal Vigano’s letter, above, as it is far too common for us to find that those who seem to be offering hope and some kind of “salvation” either just have their own “power acquisition or retention” agenda, or other selfish reasons for encouraging us to trust them or give them our support… or our cash! From this angle, then, it was perhaps not that surprising that on 19 Aug 2020, a mainstream journalist asked Trump if, indeed, the Q Anon inferences were accurate – i.e. that Trump was trying to save the world… His response was interesting, to say the least!
Trump responded, initially, with “confrontational politics” in mind:
Although I don’t really pay much attention to the world of confrontational politics, due to it being based on what I mostly consider to be irrelevant issues (their irrelevance is hard for most people to accept, because of all the enormous crimes that have been successfully covered up), I found it interesting to hear what Hillary Clinton recently said about the prospect of Trump being re-elected in November 2020. In a 03 Sep 2020 Tucker Carlson report, Clinton was shown in a video, saying:
The Carlson report also talks about other potential disruptions to the US 2020 Presidential election, which could involve the military. Isn’t it ironic that the alleged Democrat Hillary Clinton suggested that the loser of the democratic election should not concede… Are the forces which were in control of the Bush and Obama Administrations (Republican, then Democrat) getting worried?
Donald J Trump and the US Space Force and… Roswell
Despite having written a book about the Secret Space Programme, I hadn’t taken much interest in Trump’s announcements about a “Space Force,” in December 2019.
The flag of the newest branch of the US military is certainly interesting in its own right, due to its close resemblance to the logo used in the 1970’s BBC TV show “Blake’s 7.” The themes of this show revolve around “a group of convicts and outcasts fighting a guerrilla war against the totalitarian Terran Federation from a highly advanced alien spaceship.” Few fans will ever forget the name of the advanced alien space craft that came into possession of the “guerrillas.” They called it “The Liberator.” The first episode of Blake’s 7 (called “The Way Back”) seems to have many accurate projections/predictions considering it was made over 40 years ago. In one scene, the main protagonist, Blake, is falsely charged with crimes against children…
Whilst on the theme of space and aliens, I also came across a “Father’s Day 2020” special interview between Donald J Trump and his son. Near the end of this interview, Don Jr asks his father about the Roswell incident.
Condemning the “QAnon conspiracy theory”
In the video by “Amazing Polly,” linked above, she reported on an article posted on “The Hill” website on 25th Aug 2020 entitled “Bipartisan lawmakers introduce resolution condemning QAnon conspiracy theory:
The article reports:
It is interesting to consider that 2 congressman got together from “both sides” and took time to put together this “resolution of condemnation…” What was it that Martin Geddes was saying about the effects QAnon revelations could have…? And where is the evidence that “conspiracy theories” fuel “prejudice, violence and terrorism?” Have they been given the same script as former UK Prime Minister David Cameron was given in 2014?
NESARA and GESARA?
Several times, since the turn of the millennium, various web postings have appeared about NESARA – “National Economic Security And Reformation Act” which can be likened to the Q Anon scenario, as it also relates to the idea there is a “secret group of good guys” who are working to bring in a new economic and/or monetary system which would cancel debts and increase general wealth.
In recent months, a “new version” of NESARA has appeared, dubbed GESARA – “Global Economic Security and Reformation Act”. This seems to be a clone of NESARA, and lists many (or all) or the same claims such as:
A video by Santa Surfing Beach Broadcast, and a related article “NESARA / GESARA Part 21 – All items checked!” goes through some points of evidence, claiming that GESARA is in the process of being “rolled out.” Make of this what you will!
The Fall of the Cabal?
If you want to learn about further Q Anon revelations, with some additional context, the 3-hour long “Fall of Cabal” video, by Janet Ossabard makes for compelling viewing in some parts, and is certainly the result of a considerable amount of research and editing work. The information in it is well-presented and explained, though again, discernment may be necessary with parts of it – and some parts are incorrect (again, do your own research to establish this!).
Split into 10 parts/chapters, it is, like the videos mentioned earlier in this article “pro-Q Anon” but has been subject to some censorship online (particularly part 5), so you may need to hunt for alternative postings if the one above disappears. The ending is also very interesting – if difficult to believe, therefore claims of its veracity need considering carefully!
The Flip Side?
Up to now, what I have written about Q Anon and Trump suggests that they are a thorn in the side of the “globalists”. Indeed, extremely pointed comments by Billionaire Globalist, George Soros, in Jan 2018 at a World Economic Forum event suggest that this is the case:
(These comments are included in a video by “The Remnant TV,” presented by Michael Matt.)
As I alluded to above, it’s possible that Trump is just “playing the game” for the globalists, to give people false hope that the globalists will not get their way. Perhaps he is just a “good actor” who, like the other “actors,” has us fooled… Let us not forget some of the people Trump still has working for him too, as someone mentioned to me: His secretary of state, Mike Pompeo for example, is Ex CIA and has made some “interesting” statements in the past:
Also we can remember Trump’s apparent reversal on vaccinations in relation the COVID-19 scam, when he once said the virus would “go away without a vaccine.” He also appears to have “flip-flopped” on the use of face masks during the “plannedemic”
In an interesting 11 Aug 2020 video by Brendon O’Connell, following a presentation of evidence that Israel is now forming new national alliances with several countries (implying that long-standing US-Israel ties have been changing or even weakening), O’Connell posits a different take on what Trump might be doing. O’Connell suggests:
Is O’Connell correct? It’s an interesting perspective, and perhaps more “inline” with the “pattern of operations” which we’ve seen the wealthy and the powerful follow, for the greater part of history.
Over the next 2 years, it will probably become a lot clearer which way this goes. We will see whether or not “Q Anon” and the group that he/she/it/they are associated with does want a fairer, more equitable, more peaceful world – with a greater proportion of freer, more empowered, more dignified, more respectful, more joyous, kinder and more compassionate and loving people… In the meantime, as individuals, we can continue to strive, in our own ways, to create the conditions for this sort of world to manifest.
Critiques of Q-Anon
Update: Purge 2020 – Wolf Clan Media Video
This also has some interesting elements for consideration.
Also see this important critique.