FW: Diana Inquest Verdict – ‘Unlawful Killing’. Britain Deceived.

From: Andrew Johnson

Date: 2011-11-04 22:58:40

Additional info below – some good points made, I think. From: Barry & TheresaSent: 04 November 2011 16:31To: Barry and Theresa DunfordSubject: FWD: Diana Inquest Verdict – ‘Unlawful Killing’. Britain Deceived. the-tap.blogspot.com…   Wednesday, November 02, 2011 Diana Inquest Verdict – ‘Unlawful Killing’. Britain Deceived. I was browsing a link sent in by the indefatigable Wasp, and came across the fact that the verdict of the Diana Inquest was not reported in the UK, and still hasn’t been. The verdict was nothing less than ‘unlawful killing’.The website vigilantcitizen, talking about the film called ‘Unlawful Killing’ released in June 2011, writes –Strangest of all was the media coverage of the verdict. Inquest evidence showed conclusively that the crash was caused by an unidentified white Fiat Uno and several unidentified motorcycles, vehicles that were certainly not paparazzi, because uncontested police evidence confirmed that the paparazzi were nowhere near the tunnel at the time of the crash. The jury understood this, bringing in a verdict of “unlawful killing” by unidentified “following vehicles”; yet within seconds, the BBC was misreporting that the jury had blamed the paparazzi, and the rest of the media meekly followed suit. Which is why – three years on – barely anyone realises what the jury’s troubling verdict really was.

Why is the film being premiered next week at Cannes, three years after the inquest ended? Because British lawyers insisted on 87 cuts before any UK release could be contemplated. So rather than butcher the film, or risk legal action, we’re showing it in France, then the US, and everywhere except the UK. Pity, because at a time when the mindless sugar rush of the royal wedding has been sending British Rrepublicans into a diabetic coma, it could act as a welcome antidote.People react to the movie after a showing in Ireland – the-tap.blogspot.com…
They all mention the land mine issue. If she had lived and gone ahead and married Dodi, she would no doubt have moved on from there to stand for peace between Moslems and Christians – not what was being planned for 911, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and others yet to come. Was she the first casualty of The War On Terror?People remember September 11th 2001 as the moment peace was lost to the world. Maybe it was lost on August 31st 1997. People instinctively reacted as if it was a most significant moment in their lives. In retrospect, they were right to do so. Posted by Tapestry at 6:35 AM Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook 3 comments: israelite said… From what I understand there is no mention of the Zionist connection in this movie. Correct me if I am wrong.It has been claimed that after her land mine campaign Dianna was going to take up the plight of the Palestinians. Thus those most to gain with Dianna’s death would have been the Zionists.Is this movie just another case of “diversya”, diversion.A week after Dianna’s death, a friend, ex MI, explained to me how the hit was achieved. Apparently the car was taken over thru its onboard computer system and the driver was zapped by a torchlight like weapon giving off an extremely bright flash of light which is used by the security forces to temporarily stun its intended victims.Dianna was finished off in the ambulance.As a photographer I am intrigued as to who took that amazingly sharp and perfectly exposed pic of the passengers of the Mercedes as it entered the tunnel. Nobody knows who took this pic and nobody seems interested as to who took it. 10:17 AM truthi said… I need to see this film. How dare the powers that be stop the people from seeing it in this country. 11:44 AM tony_opmoc said… Diana used to go to the gym right opposite where I worked just off The Kings Road. She also used to take her Kids to The Ballet on The South Bank as we did with our kids.I was gutted when she was executed, but understood the Reasons why.It was all planned in advance. She was going round doing photo shoots disarming landmines FFS. It was that more than her sexual relationships which made her execution inevitable.The Queen Arguably had the Final Say, in our Country Going To War.As Head of State She Could Have Simply Said No.Diana would have come on TV and said exactly what she thought.She was one Hell of an Angel of a Princess.A Journalist friend of mine once told me how it was done, but I won’t bore you with the details.I went to her funeral thing, as it seemed nearly the whole “human” race did. Just another JFK. That’s what you get if you take these bastards on.I’m not suggesting any involvement from the Royal Family.Tony 10:24 PM

Related articles...

Comments are closed.